Resultater funnet: 1472
Https://atwar-game.com//forum/topic.php?topic_id=39373

Already made a topic 2 years ago, you can check it above, and now Covert Ops new strat gave me idea; How about you leave Relentless Attack as it is, but add Tank General like you did Covert Ops for marines?

You gave -2 attack and +3 defence to marines, so how about you make Tank General change tanks to;

-2 attack
+2 defence
-1 range
-20 cost

Here's the reason; make tanks tactically balanced, tanks are armored beasts, their sheer size and weight is designed for the sole reason to protect infantry while giving them firepower advantage with its big gun.
For some reason, stock tanks have 7 range, unlike infantry's 6 range, so new TG can remove 1 range point. Also less attack and more defence to make them balanced in stats, now tanks become tactical, not support anymore. The barrel gives them more firepower, hence tanks still have better attack then infantry in-game, fuel consumption actually makes them slower than infantry in real life, but 5 range would break the unit, 6 is perfect, and 6 armor points is decent, while leaving 4 to stock tanks without strategy.
The armor blocks and narrows down the viewrange of the crew, so maybe it requires -2 viewrange as hidden stat, but ignore this for now.

Of course this defence buff is not enough to defend infantry alone like in real life, but it is enough to use tanks independently of infantry support in-game. Which is what tank general is all about.

From hidden stats, i guess logical way would be to give tanks +1 attack vs tanks, -1 defence vs militia (molotov ambush?), and maybe +1 defence vs infantry (5.56 still can't penetrate 700mm ceramic armor, even with uranium-grade bullets). Thus making Guerilla Warfare something like counter to TG.

I think it is time to buff the tanks and make them what they really are, slow battle machines, with armor.
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av Country55, 26.01.2021 at 19:08

Skrevet av Sun Tsu, 25.01.2021 at 05:40

You miss the point. Everything is relative to the economy in which it operates.
The wages in developing economies are substantially lower than that of developed economies.

the intelligence in developing countries are also lower

A very sweeping 'statement'. You are basically implying that, you are more intelligent than half of the global population, which is with respect palpable nonsense. I would go as far as to say among the middle classes in developing economies that the academic intelligence levels are higher, as higher standards of education are more accessible. Regardless, intelligence arrives in many forms and most people I meet from developing economies are able to construct a legible English statement or sentence, meaning I assume their (literal) Intelligence levels to be higher than that of your own and that is with English not even being their native language. Can you spot the irony here?
Here is an article you should read:
https://www.gadgetsnow.com/slideshows/15-indian-origin-executives-that-are-ruling-the-tech-industry/dinesh-paliwal-president-and-ceo-harman-international/photolist/67694412.cms
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av ITSGG1122, 26.01.2021 at 14:59

The question was if absolutism holds back innovation. So i dont know what ur on about enlighted absolutism. It is really simple. Before the great divergence and especially before the religious wars, Europe wasnt technologically neither economically farther than China nor Islamic world. Europe was lacking way behind.

So you attribute mentality, economic policy and a way of life to the great divergence. Do you know what absolutist systems are?
What makes England have a less absolutist system than for example China or Ottoman empire. Do they not have freeer economic policies, do they not have an open mentality. Read again the definition of innovation.

USA because of Trump 100x better because they had 15000 protest?
Are you just dumb or trolling now. If you want to have a real discussion then stop trolling.
You protest because you think something is bad and you want to change something. In this regarding change comes after such protests. When you protest against Trump or trumps policies, the freedom and making the country better doesnt come from Trump, it comes because of him....

What has culture to do with anything of this?
Again the question is if absolutism holds back innovation, and why the great divergence started in England.
Your culture changes over time if you havent noticed. Death penalty, burning witches was quite normal in England, now its not. Traditions change, it just takes time, so dont attribute culture this this...
Also i pointed out they started from rock bottom. Do you agree with this or not? Stop bringing up useless shit.

Yes China has been at the top of the world for nearly all centuries in written human history.
Then again, why did they not experience the great divergence, and did the West do?
Tell me why Japan became so rich so fast, when they abolished absolutism, the same for the other Asian Tigers.
Sure some absolutist countries can become very rich very fast, like the oil rich countries or Venezuela in the 70s, but you know this isnt real wealth. Its temporary wealth. You as a Russian should know what it means when your country leans on gas and oil exports. Russia and slump/ down oil prices > economic depression.

I didnt say chinese arent innovative, they are very innovative people. I said absolutism holds back innovation. Stop putting words into another. So where is your argument for absolutism?

5g, parler?
Was that my example? Why dont you go into the example i gave? Seems to me you have no arguments and you dont take any stance. Youre just blank.
To my understanding, parler is american.
And why would you attribute 5g to totalitarian way of China?
Its Korea who introduced 5G as the first country.
Oh and btw, we have the internet because of, you guessed it , the americans.

First you say China can never be threat because of Ocean, then you say it will be a threat when usa says so. Make up your mind.
China can always become a threat to US dominance, thats what i argued there.
For example. There is a civil war in Russia. Can Chinese proxies win against US proxies in that case. If china can challenge US dominance in that way then they pose a threat.
An ocean doesnt stop that. As if USSR never posed a threat to US dominance.

Why America would worry about Chinese- chinese relations? (taiwan- china)
So should Germany invade Kalinigrad and make it German again?
Do Taiwanese people have a say what happens to they country?
USA worries because they are as you know the world power. Their backyard is nowadays every continent. And because of their power, every country will ask them for help. Its not as if Taiwanese government is extremely against USA, if that were the case then obviously USA would rethink its taiwanese policy.

Read about the great divergence. A good book would be guns, steel, germs from jared diamond or China, europe and making the modern world from Kenneth pomeranz.


1. East asian tigers were dictatorships when their economies boomed(Singap, ROK)... its common knowledge... plus they had access to the largest market in the world - USA, like Japan. For decades.
So much about your freedom and fair competition in the economy. Just another proof that absolutism with market economy is more effiicient than democracy or communism.

2. People flee poverty, not lack of freedom. They couldn't care less about politics as long they have money. Take away money from americans and west europeans and watch the bloodbath. They wont give a dime about whos white, black, conservative, immigrant or atheist.
They teach you narrative how your vote matters and you are great democracy, while they(oligarchs) maintain the hierarchy with money, liberty. We don't live the Orwellian distopia, but Brave new world.

3. There is no definite answer for Great Divergence, but in layman term, it is mostly due to european colonialist mercantilism (greed), you guessed it - oligarchs. Common european was farming and living peacefully for centuries until oligarchs recruit him to fight for some catholic leagues, habsburgs, ancien regimes, coalitions. The oligarchs made 'companies' to get richer, east indian company, dutch indonesian company whatnot, facilitating trade and finance, followed by brutal wars to genocide local populations to extract resources from their native land. Abundance of new resources forced people to find a way to 'mold' it into a product and sell it for profit(tech inov). A noble endevour for a commoner, who can, now, make a life easier for all of us, but the end goal is the same - money for the oligarch.

4. Russian? I am no russian you noob, just another proof you see Russians anywhere people disagree with your worldview. Thats racism actually.
I said 100 times and i will say again... i am Buryat. there are f*cking 200 nations in Russia (hence the federation, not republic..), not everyone is Russian... Russians comprised 50% of USSR population, 70% of RF today. They were never the dominant group and even crosses have crescent moon on them because literally half the population of russia were muslims for its existence. Of course this goes against your Russia bad narrative.
And i am not even from Russia, my mother emigrated due to bad living standard when USSR collapsed, which is interesting, democratic Russia is losing 1 million people a year (less babies, more dead, not emigration) while communist Russia was adding 2.5 million each year, doubling the population or its 70 years of existance (from 140m to 290m) and that after surviving WW2. So if you want russians to stop pointing out how communism was better, and you want your beloved democracy in Russia, you should do more than bringing tanks to baltic and repeating like a parror 'bad russia'.
Laster...
Laster...
Also there is no wall bug, battle/tb bug or wf went in bug, if something happen it's your fault.

A failed wall isn't a bug if you move the unit of the wall too much to have a perfect wall during your turn, it won't make the wall, and maybe make a wall with another unit.

Battle bug or tb bug it's the same thing it depends on how you merged stacks and where you attack, and the range of the oppenent units.

If a wf goes in it's because a capital and a city with a gen have a bigger hitbox.

For me it's game mechanics.
(that's completely off topic but who cares)
Laster...
Laster...
If you leave few units behind they will defend the AT and if they die all the units in AT die without defending.
If you don't AT will def first.
Maybe if you don't move the AT or if you send the AT in the units, units will defend first I don't remember if I tried that.
Anyway only a noob wouldn't have his AT in a city or walled so I didn't really study that shit.

Also if you get wall tbed it depends on the oppenents units.

Maybe this can change with a general but I don't think.
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av PleaseMe, I dag at 01:51

Here is an image of infantry defending inside an Air Transport.
NO the air transport did not crit. The infantry defended first.


Here is another image of infantry NOT defending inside an Air Transport.


Does anyone have a good explanation as to why sometimes it defends and other times it doesn't?

Depends on whether the air transport has moved, there are 2 cases:
1) the transport does not move in this case the infantry defends it
2) The transport moves in this case the infantry does not defend it
Laster...
Laster...
Here is an image of infantry defending inside an Air Transport.
NO the air transport did not crit. The infantry defended first.


Here is another image of infantry NOT defending inside an Air Transport.


Does anyone have a good explanation as to why sometimes it defends and other times it doesn't?
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av Andartes, 24.01.2021 at 12:10

In the USA you can vote how you like, by going to the polling station, via email, real mail, having the ballot sent to you, voting on different days, it's crazy.

Now let's talk about voters demographics: middle aged, older, conservative, white, with jobs vote republicans, while young, unemployed, from immigrant background, non-white vote democrats. Usually.

Combine these two and you have a havoc; i didn't even pay much attention but since TV was on i saw enough; people who count votes throwing half of the votes in the trash, people who just drive-in and throw their letter(with vote in it) through the window, people voting without IDs (to prove their residence, citizenship, basic details)... Trump had no chance.

If election rules where normal, like showing up with the ID and casting vote on the spot, Trump would win with 70-30% ratio.

People with disabilities vote from their home on the election day when workers from the polling stations send a crew FROM their ranks on that particular day with the proper ballot come to their door. Every community knows who those people are so they don't even have to notify the state, they will simply wait and somewhere between 9 in the morning to 9 evening for doorbell to ring. I say this because this is the only counter-argument to why would you vote in person i explained above.



But i must add that choosing congressmen is impressive, where politicians can only compete in their county, regardless of party affiliation for the spot in the capital. The only other country i can think of to practice this is Belarus. In other countries, parliaments are filled with politicians born in the capital, some of them who never traveled and completely oblivious to the state of their provinces, countryside and other cities.



EDIT: i just found out that US states have different laws and rules about voting [https://ballotpedia.org/Why_do_states_have_different_election_rules%3F_(2020)]



traditionally whites vote conservative and non whites vote progressive.
However in 2020 compared to 2016 the opposite happened.
Less whites voted for trump in 2020 than in 2016 compared to Biden.
And More NON- whites voted for trump in 2020 than in 2016 compared to Biden.

https://www.brookings.edu/research/2020-exit-polls-show-a-scrambling-of-democrats-and-republicans-traditional-bases/
https://prnt.sc/xow1th
As you can see, the democratic share decreased for non whites compared to 2016 and the share for white increased compared to 2016. Bare in mind, that more people went voting in 2020 than in 2016.

Furthermore, the demographics in USA is :
73% white
27% non- white
https://prnt.sc/xowejo

The racegroup white includes of middle eastern + north african
https://prnt.sc/xowhgb

This race group is around 10 million. ( if we exclude jewish americans, you'd get 3-4 million)
https://prnt.sc/xownnd

So lets say the demographics are 70-30%

Well i guess around 95% of all white people have to vote conservative in order for trump to win if all those non-whites voted blue.
In the source above you'd see this isnt the case.
For whites its 41 blue 59% red.

Unemployment in USA isnt that high... so why say that people who dont have jobs vote blue. There is no argument defending that.
If the unemployment was high, and majority of those were non-white then you'd have a point. But unemployment isnt high, and majority of those arent non-white.

The fuck are you on about politicians being oblivious with their province?

Many countries, like for example the U.K. a member of parliament must win its district to get the seat, even though his party wins. If he loses his district vote he doesnt become a MP.

Before getting into american politics know your stuff.
Laster...
Laster...
26.01.2021 i Why
Skrevet av Sean Spicer, 25.01.2021 at 10:54

This is how you learn, you have to get thrown in the deep end and you'll either swim or die. Sure, some people might die occasionally, but we get a stronger overall community

I don't think toxicity and making people quit is going to make us a stronger community. I don't mean shittalk between two players either, when entire groups of people conspire to make one player feel bad, that's toxicity. In competitive, you can sort of go lone wolf since you only need yourself or small groups to duel and cw. But for scenarios with a dozen player, having everybody conspire against you will completely ruin your experience.
Laster...
Laster...
I like really PD for prussia.
Laster...
Laster...
GC IF LB Blitz Imp , in that order
Laster...
Laster...
26.01.2021 i Why
Skrevet av sirivann, 24.01.2021 at 23:07

Why ppl dont just mute ppl, deleting ur acc after all those hrs invested .....


ikr why the fuck delete.
Laster...
Laster...
This beast didn't crash for 6 years lmao
Maybe I should change the browser from google chrome
any suggestions?
Laster...
Laster...
Laster...
Laster...
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av Country55, 26.01.2021 at 19:16

are you guys 10 years old?

I am, yeah
Laster...
Laster...
how to use banks
step 1: disable buildings
Laster...
Laster...
All of you who are arguing on this thread killed dueling
all of you arguing are campers
all of you literally play broken and overhyped strats'
all of you literally spam the same country
dueling is dead

stop trying to claw on to your little glory that you've had on this fuckin browser game
like arguing about muh winrates?
are you guys 10 years old?
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av Sun Tsu, 25.01.2021 at 05:40

You miss the point. Everything is relative to the economy in which it operates.
The wages in developing economies are substantially lower than that of developed economies.

the intelligence in developing countries are also lower
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av Fatcheek, 26.01.2021 at 10:03

Skrevet av DeepFriedUnicorn, 25.01.2021 at 21:35



I do not get a single point your trying to make...


How?

If anyone spends lots of time in a bubble online/social media... Their mind will be fucked and start blaming everything on the jews or blacks. Which is why people from YouTube go to parler or some other platforms when they get taken down when saying "The holocaust didn't happen".. "Bro, it is just an opinion" among others, like "5g causes the virus." "But bro it's just opinion"

I don't see how this hard to get though...
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av Witch-Doctor, 26.01.2021 at 14:28

Skrevet av Fatcheek, 26.01.2021 at 13:29

Democrats in 2016: "The Election was INFLUENCED by Russia"
Media:
Republicans in 2020: "The Election is rigged"
Media: rEPubLICiANs AttEmptInG tO unDerMiNe OuR DeMORAcY aND oVerTurN tHE eLEcTION

fixed that for you

yeah, because the obvious implication of claiming that the election was influenced by Russia is that the results would not have changed... not. That is historical revisionism because you and all the other Michael Moores out there thought it was rigged
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av Fatcheek, 26.01.2021 at 09:58

Skrevet av International, 26.01.2021 at 07:49

Skrevet av Fatcheek, 25.01.2021 at 14:37
China is a very prosperous country at the moment, and its currently leading the world in trade and technology, very much on its way to being the Global Superpower, which even Americans are scared of. After all, the tariffs say a lot about it.

A strong nation is not necessarily a good thing.

It doesn't really matter to me how influential my country is on the international stage. What matters to me is the quality of life I can enjoy from living in my country of citizenship. It certainly helps if my country is an innovative hotspot or a global great power, because these things means it's easier for me personally to grow wealthier, but they are not good things in and of themselves.

And the quality of life in China is... well, I wouldn't want to live that way. I like my freedom of thought and expression too much.


China is not a bad country to live in. In fact, Chinese Cities are much safer to live in then places like New York or San Francisco. And it's not like Chinese citizens don't enjoy a good life, In fact, their lifestyle is pretty well. You can criticize the government but just no USA Style Protesting.



Their parents experienced poverty. Huge poverty.They experienced the great famine. What stories do you think they will tell their kids at the dinner table?
When i met chinese people, and ask them about the communist rule, all of them say the exact same thing.
"We know communism and the one party system is bad. But as long as our live keeps getting better we wont complain.".

This is mainly due to the huge poverty history of China.
I'd rather live in a country where you can ridicule the president (Trump)
than live in a country where you go to jail if you ridicule the president (Xi xinping)
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av Sid, 26.01.2021 at 15:18

Followed!

What are you gonna stream? And do you have a schedule?

Sometimes atwar! But definitely bigger games. Mainly League of Legends, Overwatch, Call of Duty, and Starcraft. But i'll definitely stream other games too.
Laster...
Laster...
Followed+notifications on, I will backseat you to the death if you play atwar.
Laster...
Laster...
Skrevet av Fatcheek, 26.01.2021 at 09:55

Skrevet av ITSGG1122, 25.01.2021 at 15:56

Skrevet av Fatcheek, 25.01.2021 at 14:37

Skrevet av ITSGG1122, 22.01.2021 at 08:12

Skrevet av Andartes, 20.01.2021 at 11:44

Skrevet av International, 17.01.2021 at 07:09
















I don't see how you believe that democracy is the one that causes all the innovation. The Soviet Union was the firsts one to send a human into space and had a very successful Space Program and had established of networks of water, electricity, heating, and transport almost free.
You keep using England as an example, but do you not realize England was not a democracy before 1918? and when they were a democracy, women couldn't vote for some time. That's a pretty huge portion of the population not being able to vote...

If protests are good for the government, I wonder why Hong Kong is a piece of garbage after the protests. I wonder why the Insurrection at the capitol didn't make the government better... and btw, it's not like you can't criticize the government, or do demonstrations for new policies in China, Legal protests exist too. Those things happen all the time. Chinese Criticism Network is much more effective than the western one and doesn't lead to shit like Insurrections, attempting to overthrow the government like in the US, and burning down entire sections of cities. Not even gonna write much on the book print thing, but just saying, 5G..

Your being in-denial when you claiming China is nowhere near a superpower. The Number of Mega Projects that China has planned is remarkable, and China holds lots of control over the world stage. and gets more powerful by the day. Meanwhile, the US has been isolating itself from World Issues.

US Debt Bubble explodes one day btw, Thats is the death of the United States of America.


Ýes the USSR send the first human to space. Yes they had networks of water, electricity, heating and yes free transportation.
Do you realize how much they spent on human space exploration?

It is no wonder Elon musk is situated in you know....USA.
Space exploration costs a lot of money. Main reason the US stopped going into space again.
What i mean by absolutism holds back innovation. ( i thought this is common sense lol) is for example:
Russia had a totalitarian state when they were USSR. Communist as well.
What if the revolution in 1917 did not make them communist, but rather democratic and a bit like western europe. Would you not think that Russia would have had many more technological inventions.
In history, people flee from totalitarian systems and go to places were they are welcomed. In todays world, the open places are democratic. Why that matters? Smart people always flee the country at first. This is called brain drain. Why do you think they put up the Berlin wall? Was it not because of this brain drain? Surely east germany was rich af unlike the west

Why i bring up England? Where did the great divergence start and when.. boy this is high school level shit.
In England, absolutism vanished in 1688... the year of the Glorious Revolution. Im not talking about democracy and if and when women could vote.
For example, in Russia the Tsars ruled until 1905 or well into the first world war.

Do i really have to explain why protesting for change is a good thing? Sure, looting is bad, sure killing is bad. But thats not protesting.
If your life was in a house with 4 people. 1 person is the absolutist ruler and decides everything. You want something to change, how will you achieve this? protest and demand change.
Hong Kong is a special case , because it is part of China. But what if Hong kong people want to be independent? What if they are extremely against the totalitarian rule in China. Should or shouldnt they protest? I mean cmon, use your common sense.

Yes China is becoming stronger by the year. They have 1.3 billion people, what did you expect? But neither in soft nor hard power they are a challenge yet to USA. USA hightlight was in 1991 and since then its declining, but cmon we dont live in a multipolar world. There is only 1 superpower, which is USA and China is nowhere close it it. They are getting close to USA dominance, but it the USA still has its dominance until like 2050. I even expect China to get a revolution by then and a civil war which kills their economy before 2050.

USA debt is fine... if you had knowledge of economics you'd realize debt in this financial world is good, as long as you have a good economy and or in USA case, as long as you hold the dominant power.
Greece has in the eurocrises had/has huge debts. This isnt normally a problem as long as you have a good economy which translates into confidence of the financial markets in your country > which then translates into lower interests for your payment of debt. https://prnt.sc/xo7ra1
USA debt is just normal as other countries.
In the case of US, it actually benefits them to have more debt. Its weird but thats how economics work.
Simple explanation:
USA has good rating > pays 0.5% interest for its debts
Greece has bad rating > pays 15% interest for its debts.
A smart guy would take a loan of 0.5% interest and lend it to the guy who pays 15% interest.
Ofcourse there is much to it , but this is simplified.

USA has the luck of being geographically positioned well, and having all the resources it needs. It is literally the only country who can isolate itself from the world and stay sufficient. China on the other hand, does not have the necessary resources....
Laster...
Laster...
Stream League pls
Mecoach
Laster...
Laster...
Sure, i'll follow
Laster...
Laster...
Sid
26.01.2021 i Follow me on Twitch
Followed!

What are you gonna stream? And do you have a schedule?
Laster...
Laster...
Sitat:
Skrevet av Andartes, 26.01.2021 at 01:42

Skrevet av ITSGG1122, 25.01.2021 at 15:56


Skrevet av ITSGG1122, 25.01.2021 at 15:56


Skrevet av ITSGG1122, 25.01.2021 at 15:56


Skrevet av ITSGG1122, 25.01.2021 at 15:56


Skrevet av ITSGG1122, 25.01.2021 at 15:56


Skrevet av ITSGG1122, 25.01.2021 at 15:56






The question was if absolutism holds back innovation. So i dont know what ur on about enlighted absolutism. It is really simple. Before the great divergence and especially before the religious wars, Europe wasnt technologically neither economically farther than China nor Islamic world. Europe was lacking way behind.

So you attribute mentality, economic policy and a way of life to the great divergence. Do you know what absolutist systems are?
What makes England have a less absolutist system than for example China or Ottoman empire. Do they not have freeer economic policies, do they not have an open mentality. Read again the definition of innovation.

USA because of Trump 100x better because they had 15000 protest?
Are you just dumb or trolling now. If you want to have a real discussion then stop trolling.
You protest because you think something is bad and you want to change something. In this regarding change comes after such protests. When you protest against Trump or trumps policies, the freedom and making the country better doesnt come from Trump, it comes because of him....

What has culture to do with anything of this?
Again the question is if absolutism holds back innovation, and why the great divergence started in England.
Your culture changes over time if you havent noticed. Death penalty, burning witches was quite normal in England, now its not. Traditions change, it just takes time, so dont attribute culture this this...
Also i pointed out they started from rock bottom. Do you agree with this or not? Stop bringing up useless shit.

Yes China has been at the top of the world for nearly all centuries in written human history.
Then again, why did they not experience the great divergence, and did the West do?
Tell me why Japan became so rich so fast, when they abolished absolutism, the same for the other Asian Tigers.
Sure some absolutist countries can become very rich very fast, like the oil rich countries or Venezuela in the 70s, but you know this isnt real wealth. Its temporary wealth. You as a Russian should know what it means when your country leans on gas and oil exports. Russia and slump/ down oil prices > economic depression.

I didnt say chinese arent innovative, they are very innovative people. I said absolutism holds back innovation. Stop putting words into another. So where is your argument for absolutism?

5g, parler?
Was that my example? Why dont you go into the example i gave? Seems to me you have no arguments and you dont take any stance. Youre just blank.
To my understanding, parler is american.
And why would you attribute 5g to totalitarian way of China?
Its Korea who introduced 5G as the first country.
Oh and btw, we have the internet because of, you guessed it , the americans.

First you say China can never be threat because of Ocean, then you say it will be a threat when usa says so. Make up your mind.
China can always become a threat to US dominance, thats what i argued there.
For example. There is a civil war in Russia. Can Chinese proxies win against US proxies in that case. If china can challenge US dominance in that way then they pose a threat.
An ocean doesnt stop that. As if USSR never posed a threat to US dominance.

Why America would worry about Chinese- chinese relations? (taiwan- china)
So should Germany invade Kalinigrad and make it German again?
Do Taiwanese people have a say what happens to they country?
USA worries because they are as you know the world power. Their backyard is nowadays every continent. And because of their power, every country will ask them for help. Its not as if Taiwanese government is extremely against USA, if that were the case then obviously USA would rethink its taiwanese policy.

Read about the great divergence. A good book would be guns, steel, germs from jared diamond or China, europe and making the modern world from Kenneth pomeranz.
Laster...
Laster...
I unironically love how this thread became a serious, public conversation about why certain things can't be done right now and what it would potentially take to do them in the future. It's one of the things I love about this community.
Laster...
Laster...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Personvern | Vilkår for bruk | Bannere | Partners

Copyright © 2021 atWar. All rights reserved.

Følg oss på

Spre budskapet