|
India might be poor in-game but in reality it's not comparable to China or Japan economically in the slightest... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28nominal%29
I think the breakup and incomes are pretty decent but Japan needs more income compared to China.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
UM>>>>>>> Asia curently has china,japan and indea. if anything the other countrys need to have lower income OR more states.
I understand if your playing just asia then you have a good argument. In a world game though Asia is the bomb so makeing it even bigger would hinder the entire world.
I myself am an Audio Engineer and we have a saying when you cant here something.
is it to quiet or is something else to loud making it hard to hear.
in the case of to loud you turn the loud thing down makeing the quit thing come out more. in the case of to quit you just turn it up.
Asia i belive is to loud on the map and its fix needs to be turned down alowing other countrys to sound louder reflecting a better overall ballance.
Im not talking Big changes even makeing all the countrys in asia produce 7 units insted of 8 per turn would be a Big adjustment.
----
Where's the BEEF!
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
The only thing in this thread I can agree with is that it's too easy to conquer China. The Chinas and Koreas should be defended by infantry, just like Japan and India. And India should be kept the way it is. If we insist on all countries having the same bonus and the same amount of reinforcements it totally kills the fun in fighting about key locations. The game is supposed to resemble the real world, there's no sense in splitting Germany in two parts again and attempt to bring it down to the same level as Mali just for the sake of balance. And in the end it's all about the challenge anyway. Any of you ever had that feel when starting as Fiji and bringing down China?
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
I vote to keep India as it is. As the British once worked out, it is the crown jewel of any empire. It is the crux of any invasion strategy, and it is the country that most people will fight to the death for. Considering the huge amount of units Pakistan gets (and even Bangladesh), it really isn't that hard to conquer India within 10 turns, if that is your sole focus.
I sincerely hope India isn't partitioned: it's good to have some key locations that everyone wants.
----
Hello, I listen to Shakira and Rihanna and I support the multiculturalisation of Europe : )
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Yes India needs splitting up, it would also be cool if you didn't get the full income India gets now until you conquer Pakistan and Bangledesh, and reunite all of India again.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Skrevet av Promonex, 31.03.2011 at 01:00
The only thing in this thread I can agree with is that it's too easy to conquer China. The Chinas and Koreas should be defended by infantry, just like Japan and India. And India should be kept the way it is. If we insist on all countries having the same bonus and the same amount of reinforcements it totally kills the fun in fighting about key locations. The game is supposed to resemble the real world, there's no sense in splitting Germany in two parts again and attempt to bring it down to the same level as Mali just for the sake of balance. And in the end it's all about the challenge anyway. Any of you ever had that feel when starting as Fiji and bringing down China?
I was able to win a few whole world games as New Zealand, Jamaica, DR Congo and others... it's just awesome!
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Skrevet av nonames, 31.03.2011 at 09:48
Yes India needs splitting up, it would also be cool if you didn't get the full income India gets now until you conquer Pakistan and Bangledesh, and reunite all of India again.
I also suggest that you shouldn't get the full income in the United Kingdom until you have unified the Commonwealth again.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Skrevet av Promonex, 31.03.2011 at 11:03
Skrevet av nonames, 31.03.2011 at 09:48
Yes India needs splitting up, it would also be cool if you didn't get the full income India gets now until you conquer Pakistan and Bangledesh, and reunite all of India again.
I also suggest that you shouldn't get the full income in the United Kingdom until you have unified the Commonwealth again.
FUUUU
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Don't know 'bout India, but I've heard from developers, they will reunite USSR again, and, for game purposes will split it to 15 regions, There will be:
1. RSFSR
2. UkSSR
3. BSSR
4. UzSSR
5. KSSR
6. GSSR
7. ASSR
8. LiSSR
9. MSSR
10. LaSSR
11. KiSSR
12 TSSR
13. ArSSR
14. TuSSR
and last AND least
15. ESSR.
Also not to be totally off-topic
there will be bonus again, for reintroducing an eternal friendship of Soviet and India people. You will have to conquer both of them for 3 turns and Great General (Ghandi or Stalin or Chrustchev or Breznev) will appear near most culture town.
Also developers planning to intruduce bunch of stuff, such as cold war, to make gameplay more fun, I mean, c'mon, we all know, that MOH and COD will be shitty games, if there is no cold war or WWII in them.
----
Very vicious moderator
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Good lolz here. Split India
Laster...
Laster...
|