Video of terrorist attack in Bruxelles is FAKED

So, Video of terrorist attack in Bruxelles is false. Medias served an attack from the Moscow airport that happened in 2011 as the one from Belgium.
If this is true, what to say about people who are able to do such a things only to raise readership of their portal/newspappers






Medias......modern evil

After watching the last segment for 10 times, yes they are identical.

I guess all the footage of dead and injured people being carried away and all the hundreds of people interviewed must all be faked all because a single footage looks similar to a moscow bombing.

Skrevet av ROYAL, 29.03.2016 at 12:15

I guess all the footage of dead and injured people being carried away and all the hundreds of people interviewed must all be faked all because a single footage looks similar to a moscow bombing.

Did I say somewhere all the footage of dead and injured people being carried away and all the hundreds of people interviewed is faked?

Skrevet av ROYAL, 29.03.2016 at 12:15

I guess all the footage of dead and injured people being carried away and all the hundreds of people interviewed must all be faked all because a single footage looks similar to a moscow bombing.

Do you even read , says the video is fake not the actual bombing , medias didnt have a video and wanted to make more money so they faked it...

Skrevet av Ghostface, 29.03.2016 at 12:27

Skrevet av ROYAL, 29.03.2016 at 12:15

I guess all the footage of dead and injured people being carried away and all the hundreds of people interviewed must all be faked all because a single footage looks similar to a moscow bombing.

Do you even read , says the video is fake not the actual bombing , medias didnt have a video and wanted to make more money so they faked it...

What media dis this?

Skrevet av ROYAL, 29.03.2016 at 13:22

Skrevet av Ghostface, 29.03.2016 at 12:27

Skrevet av ROYAL, 29.03.2016 at 12:15

I guess all the footage of dead and injured people being carried away and all the hundreds of people interviewed must all be faked all because a single footage looks similar to a moscow bombing.

Do you even read , says the video is fake not the actual bombing , medias didnt have a video and wanted to make more money so they faked it...

What media dis this?

i think its news 24 of italy

Why they do that? i didn't know for this, but i know America use Russian bombing videos and present them as theirs. Why?

Skrevet av Skanderbeg, 29.03.2016 at 14:12

Why they do that? i didn't know for this, but i know America use Russian bombing videos and present them as theirs. Why?

I just watched your video, everything is said in little more than 1 minute.
In fact the same thing as my video above, only with different content, but the intention is same.

This is just showing how fucking easy medias are controlling us. Luckily, today you have internet and you can explore some things on your own, eventually find out what is truth and what is plagiarism. Problem are people who can't/won't investigate things medias are serving to us. And there are millions or even billions of them, incredibly bigger number than those who actually do look into the things deeper. And, as you know, several time repeated lie becomes truth, people again stay sheep which are easy to operate and controll.

As example I will use my vid.. Now about 40 of us know that record of terrorist attack from Bruxelles is actually faked (I don't say attack is faked, but video of it), but what is with all those people all over the world who didn't see it? Who still believe these records and think the person from it is actually a bomber searched by police?
I don't know. We are pretty fucked up in that area. Someone who controlls certain medias have benefits from it, either so he achieve more clicks/views/likes/shares on the information shared by his media, either benefits are different. And I am really scared they are different. The easiest problem is if they search only for more clicks and shares to become more popular and eventually raise income from it (which is also shameful thing, animals who are using someones trouble to earn something), but what if their intentions are bigger and deeper, also more serious ones? I can't be smart and precise here about anything, but I know I trust non media nowadadys. If I search for something or want to know things deeper, I will find it on my own.

Skrevet av Skanderbeg, 29.03.2016 at 14:12

Why they do that? i didn't know for this, but i know America use Russian bombing videos and present them as theirs. Why?

Footage. It's usually a fuck up to be honest. They want views and they are in such a rush, they tend to take any footage they can from anywhere. So if a vid goes up on social media claiming to be footage from Brussels, most media outlets will just roll with it. And if they fact check it and find that it is not Brussels, and other media puts it out.. Who gets the bigger audience? The media that didn't care about the truth. So the honest media will lose out. Why bother being right when the audience craves the experience? If dishonesty and incompetence put audiences off, media would be out of business. Put the video out and then apologize later either on Page 10 in the newspaper or in a 10sec clip mid broadcast. No one will notice or care.

Arguably, big media is already going out of business but only because the internet and alternative media provide a broader viewpoint rather than rigid state propaganda.

Edit: I assumed you were asking why media reports old footage as Brussels. In the context of the actual video you were replying to, that's standard propaganda, m8.