Skaff Premium for å skjule alle annonser
Post: 11   Besøkt av: 133 users

Undersøkelse



Yes
35
No
40

Totalt antall stemmer: 74
05.02.2019 - 18:27
Casper
Brukerkonto slettet
?
Laster...
Laster...
05.02.2019 - 19:13
Nerfing it would be more appriopriate.
Militia -1 atk, -1 def, reducing infantry defence by 2 so it becomes more easily "rushable".
Laster...
Laster...
05.02.2019 - 20:37
 Witch-Doctor (Mod)
No. It can always be balanced.
Laster...
Laster...
06.02.2019 - 08:47
Yes remove it breaks scenarios
Laster...
Laster...
06.02.2019 - 08:50
Scenario breaker. ban this strategy from scenarios.
----


Laster...
Laster...
06.02.2019 - 09:10
Skrevet av Chess, 05.02.2019 at 19:13

Nerfing it would be more appriopriate.
-1 atk, -1 def, reducing infantry defence by 2 so it becomes more easily "rushable".

i like this reasoning, but id rather see just the -2inf defense, and -1 all unit defense

I think it makes sense that in an insurrection (typically led by citizenry or a lesser equipped and poorly trained group) the attack would be good, but defense bad
----


Laster...
Laster...
06.02.2019 - 11:12
 Nero
How else are we supposed to test it? The strat has been out for like 2 days. Everyone cries that we never get anything new, and when we finally do, everyone screams and wants to go back. Shut up and play it so Dave can balance it.
----
Laochra¹: i pray to the great zizou, that my tb stops the airtrans of the yellow infidel
Laster...
Laster...
07.02.2019 - 09:01
I played with it for a few minutes, and I'm fairly convinced that it's mainly a step towards the LB Power Creep. Nothing wrong with that.
Laster...
Laster...
08.02.2019 - 12:16
What is even the logic of this yellow vest strategy? Scenarios, for instance, don't need such a Strategy that's breaking scenarios. Now, combined with the fact there aren't any new scenarios adaptable to this new strategy, you can already predict the havoc and the breaking its causing to most scenarios out there to be played.

Personally, as a Mapmaker, I'd suggest the strategy be nerfed in order to be "opposed" by other plays who face a player with this strategy. If things stand as they are, I'd suggest making this Strategy purchasable for an x sum of money (or protocoins), as its an exquisite strategy that at the current times, doesn't quite fit in within mainstream AtWar, as far as I can see..

Also, in addition, or in alternative, this could be a Strategy that could and should be subject to an opting-out by the Mapmakers. Mapmakers should decide whether this particular strategy should be usable in maps/scens or not - Would had a larger variability to the mapmaking activity, without havving to untoggle all strategies.
----
Laster...
Laster...
11.02.2019 - 03:12
It is a good strategy i do not see any problem i play many scenario and i see much hate cause it forces to orthodox players to revamp their manual with new staff
----
http://prntscr.com/omka79
http://prntscr.com/n1ymiv
Tacent quibbus Italia noverca est
Lirbur: therapy for england claims of superiority
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWyvoWzq3EM
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S8tP9wu2W0
Laster...
Laster...
11.02.2019 - 21:13
I think these ins militia need to have their costs increased. It just doesn't make sense for 40 ins militia to kill 40 GC infantry and those militia to only cost $40.
Laster...
Laster...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Personvern | Vilkår for bruk | Bannere | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Følg oss på

Spre budskapet