29.01.2017 - 12:51
Default world map, i think it would make games more interesting, like this we need like 10t to get from JPN to California and other way around, i think modern ships and planes r faster from that, i think 5 t would be more realistic and make games more interesting, or option on map, faster and slower games
---- It's scary how many possible genocidal war lords play this game, and i could be one of them
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
29.01.2017 - 13:00
5 range whould make things to op...i dont see a problem with the world map exept the opines of ds helies
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
29.01.2017 - 13:24
Problem is u need half hour or more to start over pacific war
---- It's scary how many possible genocidal war lords play this game, and i could be one of them
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
30.01.2017 - 06:51
Japan to California in one turn xD
----
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
30.01.2017 - 15:15
K, maybe not on default map... but mod a map and remove pacific ocean.
----
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
30.01.2017 - 15:20
in 7 or 6 t would be realistic
---- It's scary how many possible genocidal war lords play this game, and i could be one of them
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
31.01.2017 - 00:26
SM would be better than PD due to the extremely high range.
----
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
31.01.2017 - 00:30
This will make all the short range strategies like IF become obsolete in favour of SM. GC will also become obsolete due to SM being a better high cost strategy. NC will also become obsolete unless in low funds because SM just offers +5 extra range for a little extra cost (relative to that +5 range) Blitzkrieg is already obsolete, now it doesn't even have a little more range than SM. I doubt HW will be usable due to the low defence of tanks (ie all of the stacks have to be defended with infantry due to the fact that SM bombers can attack everywhere. MoS might be usable in a world game but SM will simply expand faster and can cross the ocean to america in a shorter time. Never implement this idea, or only Imp and SM will ever be used from now on
----
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
31.01.2017 - 00:32
Yeah lets just give 30 range to tanks while we're at it
---- Lest we forget Moja Bosna Ponosna
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
31.01.2017 - 07:55
Ok lets say it got aded Regular duel (sk) ukr vs turk (imp)...regular expansion...regular game but then ukraine caps turkey because air trans have 7 + range now (2+ fro sk 5+ fro upgrade) that shit will ruin comepetative and scnerios just so u can have pacific war :-)
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
31.01.2017 - 10:24
Ze Russian Tank Red Army will conquer all of ze world! Urraaaa!!
----
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
31.01.2017 - 14:42
its just for worlds map, lesser maps lesser range
---- It's scary how many possible genocidal war lords play this game, and i could be one of them
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
02.02.2017 - 16:05
my friend made a swastika (in real life) with tiles then destroyed it yelling here come the russians...if they add it i doubt he'll finish building it at all
----
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
02.02.2017 - 18:55
I have an itch in my ass... Luke I need your small hands please help a friend out?
---- S A M U R A I Rectitude Courage Benevolence Politeness Veracity Honor Loyalty
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
03.02.2017 - 10:16
Alrighty then, What you seem to be NOT realizing is that in order to decrease the turn time it takes to cross the pacific is that you would need to increase the range of said units. Which in turn would make them far more powerful within any given continent or body of water on the world map, not just the pacific ocean. Thus you would in turn be throwing off the balance of unit movement between all units. Right now everything is fairly balanced, *ahem*, as balanced as they can be. If you change the range for said units just so one can cross an ocean as huge as the pacific in a shorter amount of turns, than you subsequently throw all unit movement range between all units into complete unbalance. The truly proper way to deal with this is called STRATEGY. Meaning players who are in a position to actually try and cross the pacific need to be playing a long game. Which translates to, you need to be planning your moves far in advance and not wait for the right moment to strike but anticipate or plan for the right moment. You already know it takes 10 turns to cross the pacific, then you need to be planning your moves 10 turns ahead, so that your troops are in position when you need them to be. This is what is called strategy. You cannot be reactive, you must be proactive. You plot, you plan and you execute. You don't wait for things to happen, you make them happen. "UNSUPPORT!" P.S. If we had a usable mapmaker up and running then you could create this little fantasy you have but let's stay in reality and realize that truly the default map does not, should not ever, and will not ever, need to be changed just because players feel it's unfair.
---- "The edge is never very far away, when you're hanging on by your fingernails." ©
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
03.02.2017 - 10:37
blitz should been fast tactic but not have much bigger range then others, i see yours point, but we need some kind of faster units as i see
---- It's scary how many possible genocidal war lords play this game, and i could be one of them
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
04.02.2017 - 08:45
Honestly I am an advocate for never changing the default, IMO that is what the map maker is truly for, players creating their own concepts of what they think should be. So if you feel that we need faster units, than by all means, clone the world map and tweak it how you feel it should be. Then you can have your faster units and cross the pacific in less turns, but c'mon man, quit trying to change the status quo just because you don't like it. The really sad part is, what hinders you from creating your dreamworld is the fact that we still don't have a working map maker in HTML 5. So either you have some patience or just give this idea up. But honestly there are maps already created, world map clones, that have really tweaked units, you should check them out. Ratwar has made some pretty cool ones IMO. But I still stand on the UNSUPPORT for altering the existing default map just because you feel we need faster units.
---- "The edge is never very far away, when you're hanging on by your fingernails." ©
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
04.02.2017 - 16:01
i play all but still think world game is to slow, most official games we play on that map so....
---- It's scary how many possible genocidal war lords play this game, and i could be one of them
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
09.02.2017 - 05:09
This would destroy competitive play no support. I'd be in Portugal to rnw in a turn. Then from rnw to ural, ural to far east then to taiwan. Lol
---- We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
09.02.2017 - 12:53
ggg world with colonials r faster to play then modern time map, isnt that little ilogical
---- It's scary how many possible genocidal war lords play this game, and i could be one of them
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
09.02.2017 - 13:18
But ggg is a custom map the speed is on purpose. Just like the tempo of world map is on pupose.
---- We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
09.02.2017 - 14:28
Yea but i think modern world is to slow
---- It's scary how many possible genocidal war lords play this game, and i could be one of them
Laster...
Laster...
|
Er du sikker?