Hdrakon -> I GIVE YOU ALL MY LOVE

The Earth does not need the Sun, organisms require sunlight in order to survive, which means that the Sun is itself not necessarily a condition for life. Therefore, neither Earth nor the organisms that inhabit the Earth necessarily "need" the Sun. Therefore, even if you rephrase the post to compare your love for Hdrakon to organisms or sentient beings and their "need" for the Sun, the comparison would not be sincere. Sunlight is able to be replicated in any controlled environment, which I'm sure both parties have access to. Therefore, it should mean nothing to Hdrakon; by extension, your love for him is meaningless. The only thing this post does is contradict itself.

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:00

The Earth does not need the Sun, organisms require sunlight in order to survive, which means that the Sun is itself not necessarily a condition for life. Therefore, neither Earth nor the organisms that inhabit the Earth necessarily "need" the Sun. Therefore, even if you rephrase the post to compare your love for Hdrakon to organisms or sentient beings and their "need" for the Sun, the comparison would not be sincere. Sunlight is able to be replicated in any controlled environment, which I'm sure both parties have access to. Therefore, it should mean nothing to Hdrakon; by extension, your love for him is meaningless. The only thing this post does is contradict itself.

We dont need plants.

Skrevet av DeepFriedUnicorn, 29.01.2020 at 15:08

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:00

The Earth does not need the Sun, organisms require sunlight in order to survive, which means that the Sun is itself not necessarily a condition for life. Therefore, neither Earth nor the organisms that inhabit the Earth necessarily "need" the Sun. Therefore, even if you rephrase the post to compare your love for Hdrakon to organisms or sentient beings and their "need" for the Sun, the comparison would not be sincere. Sunlight is able to be replicated in any controlled environment, which I'm sure both parties have access to. Therefore, it should mean nothing to Hdrakon; by extension, your love for him is meaningless. The only thing this post does is contradict itself.

We dont need plants.

If a "need" constitutes a condition for survival, then you're correct with respect to yourself, but perhaps not the entirety of mankind.

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:00

The Earth does not need the Sun.

Just a retard said this.

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:11

Skrevet av DeepFriedUnicorn, 29.01.2020 at 15:08

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:00

The Earth does not need the Sun, organisms require sunlight in order to survive, which means that the Sun is itself not necessarily a condition for life. Therefore, neither Earth nor the organisms that inhabit the Earth necessarily "need" the Sun. Therefore, even if you rephrase the post to compare your love for Hdrakon to organisms or sentient beings and their "need" for the Sun, the comparison would not be sincere. Sunlight is able to be replicated in any controlled environment, which I'm sure both parties have access to. Therefore, it should mean nothing to Hdrakon; by extension, your love for him is meaningless. The only thing this post does is contradict itself.

We dont need plants.

If a "need" constitutes a condition for survival, then you're correct with respect to yourself, but perhaps not the entirety of mankind.

We do need plants

Skrevet av DeepFriedUnicorn, 29.01.2020 at 18:26

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:11

Skrevet av DeepFriedUnicorn, 29.01.2020 at 15:08

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:00

The Earth does not need the Sun, organisms require sunlight in order to survive, which means that the Sun is itself not necessarily a condition for life. Therefore, neither Earth nor the organisms that inhabit the Earth necessarily "need" the Sun. Therefore, even if you rephrase the post to compare your love for Hdrakon to organisms or sentient beings and their "need" for the Sun, the comparison would not be sincere. Sunlight is able to be replicated in any controlled environment, which I'm sure both parties have access to. Therefore, it should mean nothing to Hdrakon; by extension, your love for him is meaningless. The only thing this post does is contradict itself.

We dont need plants.

If a "need" constitutes a condition for survival, then you're correct with respect to yourself, but perhaps not the entirety of mankind.

We do need plants

I don't mean to be offensive, but you're incredibly narrow-minded and incapable of critical thought. I don't know whether you're trolling or Irish, but my point was that our "needs" need not be defined by something with as broad of a scope as "plants" or the "Sun," but rather the real conditions for life. Of course, life in itself does not necessarily flourish without other externalities, in which case other variables may be involved. As far as I'm concerned, we do not "need" plants, just as we do not "need" milk; if oxygen, water, and real or artificial sunlight is available, then life may continue.

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 19:02

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:11

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:00

Im retard

Im full retard

?? LOLOL

Your arguments show so much lack of meaning and demonstrate the great incompetence that your peanut-sized brain possesses.

You say we can live with artificial light, now I ask Could there be life on planet earth if the "sun" did not exist?..

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 19:02

Skrevet av DeepFriedUnicorn, 29.01.2020 at 18:26

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:11

Skrevet av DeepFriedUnicorn, 29.01.2020 at 15:08

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 29.01.2020 at 15:00

The Earth does not need the Sun, organisms require sunlight in order to survive, which means that the Sun is itself not necessarily a condition for life. Therefore, neither Earth nor the organisms that inhabit the Earth necessarily "need" the Sun. Therefore, even if you rephrase the post to compare your love for Hdrakon to organisms or sentient beings and their "need" for the Sun, the comparison would not be sincere. Sunlight is able to be replicated in any controlled environment, which I'm sure both parties have access to. Therefore, it should mean nothing to Hdrakon; by extension, your love for him is meaningless. The only thing this post does is contradict itself.

We dont need plants.

If a "need" constitutes a condition for survival, then you're correct with respect to yourself, but perhaps not the entirety of mankind.

We do need plants

I don't mean to be offensive, but you're incredibly narrow-minded and incapable of critical thought. I don't know whether you're trolling or Irish, but my point was that our "needs" need not be defined by something with as broad of a scope as "plants" or the "Sun," but rather the real conditions for life. Of course, life in itself does not necessarily flourish without other externalities, in which case other variables may be involved. As far as I'm concerned, we do not "need" plants, just as we do not "need" milk; if oxygen, water, and real or artificial sunlight is available, then life may continue.

Bro, have to be honest. I didn't actually read what I you said, I just saw the words "Earth" and "Sun" so I thought of plants and then said we don't Need plants. I didn't even know you were talking about needs

But, yes. We do need plants. They produce oxygen.

I love how the original post was deleted since Witness realized he has mental disorder

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 30.01.2020 at 08:06

I love how the original post was deleted since Witness realized he has mental disorder

Does this mean you realized you have one too? D

Skrevet av Tribune Aquila, 30.01.2020 at 08:06

I love how the original post was deleted since Witness realized he has mental disorder

i delete 1 retard <3 ... exits other "ORIGINAL"