|
This has been suggested before, but is still on the drawing boards till the admins can take care of more priority things.
Here's a few links to polls and posts done on this topic:
atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=18763
atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=18301
----
"For out of the ground we were taken
For the dust we are,
And to the dust we shall return"
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
KPTNEROS KOMITET OF KLUNGE FTW
but yeah you're right
----
[pr] Commando Eagle: duel?
[pr] Commando Eagle: i have to regain back the lost elos and gain extra as punishment for rush
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
----
[pr] Commando Eagle: duel?
[pr] Commando Eagle: i have to regain back the lost elos and gain extra as punishment for rush
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
I'd say minimum 10 CWs to even be on the leaderboards, and 25+ CWs to be in top 3.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stop reviving old and already mentioned topics...
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
As 12gsh stated this has been suggested before.
In terms of the suggestion, I will be proposing a minimum elo sample of x amount of games to be listed on the clan leaderboard for next season.
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Laster...
Laster...
|
Jelly Toast Brukerkonto slettet |
Jelly Toast Brukerkonto slettet
Skrevet av Zenith, 05.11.2015 at 20:52
I mean, come on, does Shadow Jacks really deserve the 9th spot in the ELO rankings if they only did one game?
Yes.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Skrevet av Guest, 06.11.2015 at 13:06
Skrevet av Zenith, 05.11.2015 at 20:52
I mean, come on, does Shadow Jacks really deserve the 9th spot in the ELO rankings if they only did one game?
Yes.
Yeah but that win though, pretty impressive
Joking aside, I do agree with OP and others who think there should be a minimum number of CW for ranking. Its silly that Shadow Jacks is ranked above Shadow Aces to name one example.
Laster...
Laster...
|