4,5h of playing 1 cw

Good game MK, deserved win.

Shortly, game lasted fucking 67 turns (268 mins / 4,5 hours) ; Euroasia 6v6.

MK had an advantage from the beggining since Aristo's 2 Asia players did a wrong move and were dead t2 and t4, but they've also fucked up Vietnam and slowed Mauzer down while Aristo was winning in the Europe.
Middle East was 50:50, Maniac and Eagle were fucking each other until Aristo cleaned up Europe and MK cleaned up Asia.

Maniac hadn't chance with full Afganistan, Pakistan, India reinfs of Eagle, so we lost him, but Opi took his land while Franz and Croat were spamming tons of units. The same was done my Mauzer on East.

I've never played more hard cw and I was never this tired, neither when I worked 10 hours per day. Really, deserved win by Eagle and Mauz, even in one period we had 45:55 chance since we managed to refresh ourselves even Asia was lost.




(Franz missing)


PS. If we knew the game is lasting 100 turns, non of us would play. I don't know who set it up to 100, but it's was the only silly move of that cw. Why? Because we would win by SP if it lasted 50 turns, anyways, heroic game by all

Croat i have never seen such a written commentatory of a cw with such an enthusiasm .

it sounds so amazing reading it high lololol

Did anyone record it?

I rage quited

Was fun, would do it again

Skrevet av Croat, 02.12.2017 at 18:48

PS. If we knew the game is lasting 100 turns, non of us would play. I don't know who set it up to 100, but it's was the only silly move of that cw. Why? Because we would win by SP if it lasted 50 turns, anyways, heroic game by all

Why the settings are bad? because we would win if they was different
nice logic

Skrevet av Davy Jones, 03.12.2017 at 06:56

Skrevet av Croat, 02.12.2017 at 18:48

PS. If we knew the game is lasting 100 turns, non of us would play. I don't know who set it up to 100, but it's was the only silly move of that cw. Why? Because we would win by SP if it lasted 50 turns, anyways, heroic game by all

Why the settings are bad? because we would win if they was different
nice logic

because who wants to spend 6 and a half hours of there life playing 100 turns

Skrevet av Gayfather, 03.12.2017 at 08:30

Skrevet av Davy Jones, 03.12.2017 at 06:56

Skrevet av Croat, 02.12.2017 at 18:48

PS. If we knew the game is lasting 100 turns, non of us would play. I don't know who set it up to 100, but it's was the only silly move of that cw. Why? Because we would win by SP if it lasted 50 turns, anyways, heroic game by all

Why the settings are bad? because we would win if they was different
nice logic

because who wants to spend 6 and a half hours of there life playing 100 turns

Did I quote you?
Look on what he said "Why? Because we would win by SP if it lasted 50 turns"

Skrevet av Davy Jones, 03.12.2017 at 10:56

Did I quote you?
Look on what he said "Why? Because we would win by SP if it lasted 50 turns"

Before CW no one knew who is gonna win, neither who will have more SP till the 50th turn.
But we were confident that game lasts 50 turns and we were counting our SP each turn (when the game was already at some of 40+ turn) until someone realized we are actually playing 100turns. And on 50th turn, Aristo had more SP.

I didn't have any negative conotatons by my comment, just said how we played on a card to try winning by SP, since we lost Asia very very early.


Also, do you think that 3of us would lose 4 hours knowing on time that game is set up to 100 turns and knowing that MK have free Asia? I guess the answer is obvious. But CW was very interesting till the 60th turn. That's all

Skrevet av Croat, 03.12.2017 at 12:15

Skrevet av Davy Jones, 03.12.2017 at 10:56

Did I quote you?
Look on what he said "Why? Because we would win by SP if it lasted 50 turns"

Before CW no one knew who is gonna win, neither who will have more SP till the 50th turn.
But we were confident that game lasts 50 turns and we were counting our SP each turn (when the game was already at some of 40+ turn) until someone realized we are actually playing 100turns. And on 50th turn, Aristo had more SP.

I didn't have any negative conotatons by my comment, just said how we played on a card to try winning by SP, since we lost Asia very very early.


Also, do you think that 3of us would lose 4 hours knowing on time that game is set up to 100 turns and knowing that MK have free Asia? I guess the answer is obvious. But CW was very interesting till the 60th turn. That's all

Skrevet av Croat, 02.12.2017 at 18:48

Why? Because we would win by SP if it lasted 50 turns, anyways, heroic game by all

Where did I miss the free Asia for MK and the 4 hours playing?
you said you would win by SP so none of you would play if you knew it was until 100 turns, logician mistake too I see.