|
Forget the machines, The Matrix is real, and at the same time, it is not. When you unplug, you realize you are surrounded by idiots. There's only one group of people who will dislike this, and I think you know which 
http://youtu.be/ljNDATT7hRk?t=16m34s
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
You may be one of the stupidest people I have met in this forum. You start arguments and refuse to finish them unless they are on the only subject you know, religion, where you act like a rebellious 13 year old who just found the internet.
----
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Another interesting thing is that, like in the movie, once you wake up, you can't go back...even if you want to. Even if you pretend nothing happened, it will always be there. And so will the desire to wake the others up. Admirable, but usually futile.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
More proof of Unleashed's inability to debate. Just ignores his opponent.
----
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated - which I wouldn't have bothered to do, had the link not been posted, and had the man not claimed to 'know' history. Here we are treated to SM providing comfort to a poor young paranoiac by continually telling the acolyte that he is saying 'wonderful and intelligent' things.
I especially like his claim that (future) College Professors are the stupidest people in college, and that anyone who is anyone should be doing things on the internet - as if the two are mutually exclusive. Of course his claim is unsubstantiated, obviously logically inconsistent and probably, factually, incorrect and eminently not falsifiable. So I endured another 1 minute of SM hoping for the revelation that wouldn't come.
That's ok, like most religious leaders he isn't accountable to reason or evidence, only his herd.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
LOL
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
1. He *claims* to be from a Jewish background, and then thoroughly distances himself from it.
2. Antisemitism is against both the religious and cultural practices of Judaism and/or people who have a Jewish heritage.
3. Is there some reason why someone who is ethnically Jewish can't be anti-semetic you moron (for example, Adolf Hitler)?
4. For all I know you are Jewish. You are *clearly* anti-semetic.
I've already demonstrated his antisemitic statements previously, you and I have no disagreement on SM's claiming to be descended from people whom he called Jewish.
Now, clearly, again, you shoot yourself in the head with your own words. This is why I can confidently claim you are stupid.
Literally you can't even structure one valid argument.
I will edit this post if I find the specific quote.
EDIT: Can't find easily, and don't really need to.
VULVA doesn't say that SM doesn't make antisemetic statements, VULVA categorically denies SM is able to make an antisemetic statement.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
LOL
See above, herd animal, I think you meant:
BAA
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
LOL
See above, herd animal, I think you meant:
BAA
You have no clue what to say anymore. Except this bitter emotional response. You lose.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
LOL
See above, herd animal, I think you meant:
BAA
You have no clue what to say anymore. Except this bitter emotional response. You lose.
How is this either bitter or emotional?
She said 'lol' when clearly you committed another VULVA (Vast Unleashed Ludicrously Vapid Argument).
Almost no one with a brain who was trying to defend SM would have done what you did.
Here are some things a reasonable person who didn't care about truth would have done. I'm not talking about a debate genius, I'm talking about an average 12 year old.
- Asked for sources of SM's antisemitism to buy time, then denied the antisemitism.
- Denied that the reference I made earlier was antisemetic.
Here is what you did:
- Denied that anything SM says can be antisemetic because his grandparents, he claims, were Jewish.
In other words, you don't deny that what he said is antisemetic, only that for some reason, he cannot be antisemetic.
No reasonable person can buy that argument and it means that if presumed Jewish people can say antisemetic things, that SM did say antisemtic things.
DO you realize you have made my argument for me?
===
And for you, of all people, to say I have no clue what to say? You are never without something to say, as far as the clue?
SM says BAA
UNL says BAA
and then Khal says BAA
I don't say: BAA, I don't use comedians as primary sources for my evidence on the existence of Human Rights or God and I don't get either bitter or emotional.
I don't even get frustrated - I choose to spend the time here - I just don't waste it trying to educate you or Khal on how grownups talk to each other.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
LOL
See above, herd animal, I think you meant:
BAA
You have no clue what to say anymore. Except this bitter emotional response. You lose.
How is this either bitter or emotional.
And for you, of all people, to say I have no clue what to say?
SM says BAA
UNL says BAA
and then Khal says BAA
Translation: I got my ignorant ass handed to myself by Unleashed and there's nothing I can say anymore.
We now see you for what you are. You are done.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
LOL
See above, herd animal, I think you meant:
BAA
You have no clue what to say anymore. Except this bitter emotional response. You lose.
How is this either bitter or emotional.
And for you, of all people, to say I have no clue what to say?
SM says BAA
UNL says BAA
and then Khal says BAA
Translation: I got my ignorant ass handed to myself by Unleashed and there's nothing I can say anymore.
We now see you for what you are. You are done.
That's not what I wrote, idiot.
See above.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Skrevet av KYBL, 30.04.2014 at 11:00
You may be one of the stupidest people I have met in this forum. You start arguments and refuse to finish them unless they are on the only subject you know, religion, where you act like a rebellious 13 year old who just found the internet.
He is *the stupidest person* I have met in this, or any other forum, ever.
To have his assbrain handed to him over and over again, and yet shamelessly he continues.
Regarding religion: He knows very little about religion, especially his favorite targets: Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
He might reply that Judaism isn't his target - that's how little he knows about what he posts ....
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
LOL
See above, herd animal, I think you meant:
BAA
You have no clue what to say anymore. Except this bitter emotional response. You lose.
Now, would someone who has threatened to kill me, and who has also used racial slurs against my presumed heritage have the moral ground to lecture me on emotional response?
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
That's not what I wrote, idiot.
See above.
You make the Holocaust seem like a reasonable and necessary solution.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
That's not what I wrote, idiot.
See above.
You make the Holocaust seem like a reasonable and necessary solution.
Necessary how? Reasonably why?
I don't know if your idiot brain has figured out these simple statements:
1. The Holocaust happened. On this we both agree.
2. It didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me because I am typing about how you cannot reason your way out of a paper bag.
3. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it reasonable?
4. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it necessary?
Again, shit in your brain gets put onto our screens. Even Nazis do facepalms at your idiocy.
===
I think it is reasonable to conclude that you enjoy being humiliated in a masochistic manner, and that this likely has a sexual component.
This hypothesis dovetails nicely with the following observations:
Foundational Premises
1. You are a violently racist and homophobic person.
2. You violently hate religion, and often claims it 'hurts children' (though where the two are connected, you never make clear).
3. It is exceedingly improbable that you could lose as many arguments you have without intending to do so.
Supporting Premises
1. Homophobia expresses itself most violently in the homosexual who suppresses his or her nature. (Latent homosexuality).
2. Racism manifests itself generally as a fear of the 'other'.
3. You obviously welcome near-daily humiliation by inviting argument and losing.
Hypothesis (lex parsimoniae) with the fewest assumptions to explain your behavior
a. Observations
1. You seek near daily humiliation.
2. Your violently abusive behavior is based on your rejection of your latent homosexuality.
3. You invite people to verbally humiliate you, then ascribe 'Jewish' or 'Gay' or 'Religious' identities to them.
4. You were sexually abused by a religious person, or a religious authority figure, but feel guilty that your latent homosexuality was somehow the driver for this abuse, and that the sexual pleasure you received from the abuse made the abuse your fault.
b. Hypothesis
You receive sexual gratification from your near-daily humiliation by people you deem to be Jewish or gay or religious.
My hypothesis presents a working model why you would deliberately submit yourself to near daily mental humiliation by people you claim to hate.
I believe it is the hypothesis with the fewest high-order assumptions which provides some explanatory value to the observations.
This revelation does not cause me to pity you any more than I did before this revelation.
Many people have overcome their sexual abuse without resorting to hate-mongering or in subjecting complete strangers, who most certainly haven't consented, to be the sadists in your masochistic fantasies.
Merely because this is the most elegant hypothesis I can come up with doesn't mean it is *true*, there may be a less-elegant-but-more-satisfactory hypothesis, but I leave it to others to offer more satisfying explanations than mine for your (otherwise) irrational behavior. Perhaps there is a simpler explanation for the observations, but again, I leave it to others.
All of this being said, I don't think Off-topic is an appropriate place for you to work out your emotional issues, and AW forums are definitely out of bounds for sexual gratification.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
That's not what I wrote, idiot.
See above.
You make the Holocaust seem like a reasonable and necessary solution.
Necessary how? Reasonably why?
I don't know if your idiot brain has figured out these simple statements:
1. The Holocaust happened. On this we both agree.
2. It didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me because I am typing about how you cannot reason your way out of a paper bag.
3. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it reasonable?
4. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it necessary?
Again, shit in your brain gets put onto our screens. Even Nazis do facepalms at your idiocy.
===
I think it is reasonable to conclude that you enjoy being humiliated in a masochistic manner, and that this likely has a sexual component.
This hypothesis dovetails nicely with the following observations:
Foundational Premises
1. You are a violently racist and homophobic person.
2. You violently hate religion, and often claims it 'hurts children' (though where the two are connected, you never make clear).
3. It is exceedingly improbable that you could lose as many arguments you have without intending to do so.
Supporting Premises
1. Homophobia expresses itself most violently in the homosexual who suppresses his or her nature. (Latent homosexuality).
2. Racism manifests itself generally as a fear of the 'other'.
3. You obviously welcome near-daily humiliation by inviting argument and losing.
Hypothesis (lex parsimoniae) with the fewest assumptions to explain your behavior
a. Observations
1. You seek near daily humiliation.
2. Your violently abusive behavior is based on your rejection of your latent homosexuality.
3. You invite people to verbally humiliate you, then ascribe 'Jewish' or 'Gay' or 'Religious' identities to them.
4. You were sexually abused by a religious person, or a religious authority figure, but feel guilty that your latent homosexuality was somehow the driver for this abuse, and that the sexual pleasure you received from the abuse made the abuse your fault.
b. Hypothesis
You receive sexual gratification from your near-daily humiliation by people you deem to be Jewish or gay or religious.
My hypothesis presents a working model why you would deliberately submit yourself to near daily mental humiliation by people you claim to hate.
I believe it is the hypothesis with the fewest high-order assumptions which provides some explanatory value to the observations.
This revelation does not cause me to pity you any more than I did before this revelation.
Many people have overcome their sexual abuse without resorting to hate-mongering or in subjecting complete strangers, who most certainly haven't consented, to be the sadists in your masochistic fantasies.
Merely because this is the most elegant hypothesis I can come up with doesn't mean it is *true*, there may be a less-elegant-but-more-satisfactory hypothesis, but I leave it to others to offer more satisfying explanations than mine for your (otherwise) irrational behavior. Perhaps there is a simpler explanation for the observations, but again, I leave it to others.
All of this being said, I don't think Off-topic is an appropriate place for you to work out your emotional issues, and AW forums are definitely out of bounds for sexual gratification.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
Stop it, you are making yourself look autistic.
What unleashed mean by his post was: you are the most annoying jew that he knows, to the point that he would be happy if you banish.
But hey! You proceed to insult him, that just proved his point.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
LOL
See above, herd animal, I think you meant:
BAA
You have no clue what to say anymore. Except this bitter emotional response. You lose.
Now, would someone who has threatened to kill me, and who has also used racial slurs against my presumed heritage have the moral ground to lecture me on emotional response?
he threatened to kill you!!oh my god!poor baby,come, run to mommy for a hug quick!everything is gonna be alright i swear!
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
That's not what I wrote, idiot.
See above.
You make the Holocaust seem like a reasonable and necessary solution.
Necessary how? Reasonably why?
I don't know if your idiot brain has figured out these simple statements:
1. The Holocaust happened. On this we both agree.
2. It didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me because I am typing about how you cannot reason your way out of a paper bag.
3. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it reasonable?
4. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it necessary?
Again, shit in your brain gets put onto our screens. Even Nazis do facepalms at your idiocy.
===
I think it is reasonable to conclude that you enjoy being humiliated in a masochistic manner, and that this likely has a sexual component.
This hypothesis dovetails nicely with the following observations:
Foundational Premises
1. You are a violently racist and homophobic person.
2. You violently hate religion, and often claims it 'hurts children' (though where the two are connected, you never make clear).
3. It is exceedingly improbable that you could lose as many arguments you have without intending to do so.
Supporting Premises
1. Homophobia expresses itself most violently in the homosexual who suppresses his or her nature. (Latent homosexuality).
2. Racism manifests itself generally as a fear of the 'other'.
3. You obviously welcome near-daily humiliation by inviting argument and losing.
Hypothesis (lex parsimoniae) with the fewest assumptions to explain your behavior
a. Observations
1. You seek near daily humiliation.
2. Your violently abusive behavior is based on your rejection of your latent homosexuality.
3. You invite people to verbally humiliate you, then ascribe 'Jewish' or 'Gay' or 'Religious' identities to them.
4. You were sexually abused by a religious person, or a religious authority figure, but feel guilty that your latent homosexuality was somehow the driver for this abuse, and that the sexual pleasure you received from the abuse made the abuse your fault.
b. Hypothesis
You receive sexual gratification from your near-daily humiliation by people you deem to be Jewish or gay or religious.
My hypothesis presents a working model why you would deliberately submit yourself to near daily mental humiliation by people you claim to hate.
I believe it is the hypothesis with the fewest high-order assumptions which provides some explanatory value to the observations.
This revelation does not cause me to pity you any more than I did before this revelation.
Many people have overcome their sexual abuse without resorting to hate-mongering or in subjecting complete strangers, who most certainly haven't consented, to be the sadists in your masochistic fantasies.
Merely because this is the most elegant hypothesis I can come up with doesn't mean it is *true*, there may be a less-elegant-but-more-satisfactory hypothesis, but I leave it to others to offer more satisfying explanations than mine for your (otherwise) irrational behavior. Perhaps there is a simpler explanation for the observations, but again, I leave it to others.
All of this being said, I don't think Off-topic is an appropriate place for you to work out your emotional issues, and AW forums are definitely out of bounds for sexual gratification.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
can you provide evidence that sexual tendencies have any relation whatsoever with one's social character traits?I am submissive in bed, but very feisty and rebellious in real life.I even enjoy making you mad in the forums and assert my dominance over you,( i will even go as far as to state that bitch slapping the shit out of you in real life would give me immense satisfaction,i might even get multiple orgasms doing it) .how you explain this proffesor? 
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
That's not what I wrote, idiot.
See above.
You make the Holocaust seem like a reasonable and necessary solution.
Necessary how? Reasonably why?
I don't know if your idiot brain has figured out these simple statements:
1. The Holocaust happened. On this we both agree.
2. It didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me because I am typing about how you cannot reason your way out of a paper bag.
3. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it reasonable?
4. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it necessary?
Again, shit in your brain gets put onto our screens. Even Nazis do facepalms at your idiocy.
===
I think it is reasonable to conclude that you enjoy being humiliated in a masochistic manner, and that this likely has a sexual component.
This hypothesis dovetails nicely with the following observations:
Foundational Premises
1. You are a violently racist and homophobic person.
2. You violently hate religion, and often claims it 'hurts children' (though where the two are connected, you never make clear).
3. It is exceedingly improbable that you could lose as many arguments you have without intending to do so.
Supporting Premises
1. Homophobia expresses itself most violently in the homosexual who suppresses his or her nature. (Latent homosexuality).
2. Racism manifests itself generally as a fear of the 'other'.
3. You obviously welcome near-daily humiliation by inviting argument and losing.
Hypothesis (lex parsimoniae) with the fewest assumptions to explain your behavior
a. Observations
1. You seek near daily humiliation.
2. Your violently abusive behavior is based on your rejection of your latent homosexuality.
3. You invite people to verbally humiliate you, then ascribe 'Jewish' or 'Gay' or 'Religious' identities to them.
4. You were sexually abused by a religious person, or a religious authority figure, but feel guilty that your latent homosexuality was somehow the driver for this abuse, and that the sexual pleasure you received from the abuse made the abuse your fault.
b. Hypothesis
You receive sexual gratification from your near-daily humiliation by people you deem to be Jewish or gay or religious.
My hypothesis presents a working model why you would deliberately submit yourself to near daily mental humiliation by people you claim to hate.
I believe it is the hypothesis with the fewest high-order assumptions which provides some explanatory value to the observations.
This revelation does not cause me to pity you any more than I did before this revelation.
Many people have overcome their sexual abuse without resorting to hate-mongering or in subjecting complete strangers, who most certainly haven't consented, to be the sadists in your masochistic fantasies.
Merely because this is the most elegant hypothesis I can come up with doesn't mean it is *true*, there may be a less-elegant-but-more-satisfactory hypothesis, but I leave it to others to offer more satisfying explanations than mine for your (otherwise) irrational behavior. Perhaps there is a simpler explanation for the observations, but again, I leave it to others.
All of this being said, I don't think Off-topic is an appropriate place for you to work out your emotional issues, and AW forums are definitely out of bounds for sexual gratification.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
can you provide evidence that sexual tendencies have any relation whatsoever with one's social character traits?I am submissive in bed, but very feisty and rebellious in real life.I even enjoy making you mad in the forums and assert my dominance over you,( i will even go as far as to state that bitch slapping the shit out of you in real life would give me immense satisfaction,i might even get multiple orgasms doing it) .how you explain this proffesor?
Does any of the evidence I have presented before even make a dent?
No.
Would any now?
No.
Did the word 'hypothesis' mean anything to you, anyway? Guess not. Even though the etymology is Ancient Greek and Late Latin.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Stefan Molyneux is a vapid anti-semetic dumbass, as I have previously demonstrated
He is jewish, you ignorant piece of shit. Once again you defeat yourself. Thanks for proving the point of this thread.
LOL
See above, herd animal, I think you meant:
BAA
You have no clue what to say anymore. Except this bitter emotional response. You lose.
Now, would someone who has threatened to kill me, and who has also used racial slurs against my presumed heritage have the moral ground to lecture me on emotional response?
he threatened to kill you!!oh my god!poor baby,come, run to mommy for a hug quick!everything is gonna be alright i swear!
And again you missed the point, stupid one.
(exhale)
One does not make death threats or racial slurs in these forums except under extreme emotional nvm
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Skrevet av Tunder4, 30.04.2014 at 20:56
That's not what I wrote, idiot.
See above.
You make the Holocaust seem like a reasonable and necessary solution.
Necessary how? Reasonably why?
I don't know if your idiot brain has figured out these simple statements:
1. The Holocaust happened. On this we both agree.
2. It didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me because I am typing about how you cannot reason your way out of a paper bag.
3. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it reasonable?
4. Since it didn't resolve or solve anything in relation to me, how was it necessary?
Again, shit in your brain gets put onto our screens. Even Nazis do facepalms at your idiocy.
===
I think it is reasonable to conclude that you enjoy being humiliated in a masochistic manner, and that this likely has a sexual component.
This hypothesis dovetails nicely with the following observations:
Foundational Premises
1. You are a violently racist and homophobic person.
2. You violently hate religion, and often claims it 'hurts children' (though where the two are connected, you never make clear).
3. It is exceedingly improbable that you could lose as many arguments you have without intending to do so.
Supporting Premises
1. Homophobia expresses itself most violently in the homosexual who suppresses his or her nature. (Latent homosexuality).
2. Racism manifests itself generally as a fear of the 'other'.
3. You obviously welcome near-daily humiliation by inviting argument and losing.
Hypothesis (lex parsimoniae) with the fewest assumptions to explain your behavior
a. Observations
1. You seek near daily humiliation.
2. Your violently abusive behavior is based on your rejection of your latent homosexuality.
3. You invite people to verbally humiliate you, then ascribe 'Jewish' or 'Gay' or 'Religious' identities to them.
4. You were sexually abused by a religious person, or a religious authority figure, but feel guilty that your latent homosexuality was somehow the driver for this abuse, and that the sexual pleasure you received from the abuse made the abuse your fault.
b. Hypothesis
You receive sexual gratification from your near-daily humiliation by people you deem to be Jewish or gay or religious.
My hypothesis presents a working model why you would deliberately submit yourself to near daily mental humiliation by people you claim to hate.
I believe it is the hypothesis with the fewest high-order assumptions which provides some explanatory value to the observations.
This revelation does not cause me to pity you any more than I did before this revelation.
Many people have overcome their sexual abuse without resorting to hate-mongering or in subjecting complete strangers, who most certainly haven't consented, to be the sadists in your masochistic fantasies.
Merely because this is the most elegant hypothesis I can come up with doesn't mean it is *true*, there may be a less-elegant-but-more-satisfactory hypothesis, but I leave it to others to offer more satisfying explanations than mine for your (otherwise) irrational behavior. Perhaps there is a simpler explanation for the observations, but again, I leave it to others.
All of this being said, I don't think Off-topic is an appropriate place for you to work out your emotional issues, and AW forums are definitely out of bounds for sexual gratification.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
Stop it, you are making yourself look autistic.
What unleashed mean by his post was: you are the most annoying jew that he knows, to the point that he would be happy if you banish.
But hey! You proceed to insult him, that just proved his point.
Your words don't make any sense to me, so I can't really meaningfully reply except to say that Unl. has assumed I am Jewish without any credible evidence, that the Holocaust really wasn't about banishment, more like extermination, and if my insulting him proved his point! Bravo! That would be the first time that his point was proven. After all, what I did (without a moment's thought) is demonstrate to reasonable people that even his innocuous phrases make no sense.
Of course, you won't address the argument, only the person making it, per your usual approach.
Yawn.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Zombie, unleashed has been trolling this entire time.
----
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Your words don't make any sense to me, so I can't really meaningfully reply except to say that Unl. has assumed I am Jewish without any credible evidence.
What is wrong with him assuming that you are a Jew? if you aren't just said so.
the Holocaust really wasn't about banishment, more like extermination
nobody is talking about the holocaust, you clearly are taking his words out of context, a normal individual is capable of understanding the real meaning behind unleashed's words, is obvious that he wasn't being literal when he said that he approved the holocaust, and my comment wasn't about what the holocaust is , i was just pointing out one of the possible meanings that unleashed tried to convey, in this case unleashed said that he would be happy if you "disappear from existence ".
if my insulting him proved his point! Bravo! That would be the first time that his point was proven. After all, what I did (without a moment's thought) is demonstrate to reasonable people that even his innocuous phrases make no sense.
oh look! kike is mad.
Of course, you won't address the argument, only the person making it, per your usual approach.
Yawn.
oh really? you want to classify me based in only one of my responses? of course i didn't address your argument, because there is no argument to address!
again (like always), you take people's words out of context, attack the individual, and then proceed to call anybody that disagrees with you a hate-filled racist.
Laster...
Laster...
|
Black Shark
Brukerkonto slettet |
Black Shark
Brukerkonto slettet
Skrevet av KYBL, 30.04.2014 at 22:35
Zombie, unleashed has been trolling this entire time.
Maybe he really is that dumb. I did see on his blog a anti religion post. And why would he go so far?
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Skrevet av Tunder4, 30.04.2014 at 22:57
Your words don't make any sense to me, so I can't really meaningfully reply except to say that Unl. has assumed I am Jewish without any credible evidence.
What is wrong with him assuming that you are a Jew? if you aren't just said so.
the Holocaust really wasn't about banishment, more like extermination
nobody is talking about the holocaust, you clearly are taking his words out of context, a normal individual is capable of understanding the real meaning behind unleashed's words, is obvious that he wasn't being literal when he said that he approved the holocaust, and my comment wasn't about what the holocaust is , i was just pointing out one of the possible meanings that unleashed tried to convey, in this case unleashed said that he would be happy if you "disappear from existence ".
if my insulting him proved his point! Bravo! That would be the first time that his point was proven. After all, what I did (without a moment's thought) is demonstrate to reasonable people that even his innocuous phrases make no sense.
oh look! kike is mad.
Of course, you won't address the argument, only the person making it, per your usual approach.
Yawn.
oh really? you want to classify me based in only one of my responses? of course i didn't address your argument, because there is no argument to address!
again (like always), you take people's words out of context, attack the individual, and then proceed to call anybody that disagrees with you a hate-filled racist.
Reported for racist slurs.
And yawn.
Racists: Listen to your masters - don't lose your emotional control - you turn away reasonable people with your hate speech.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Skrevet av KYBL, 30.04.2014 at 22:35
Zombie, unleashed has been trolling this entire time.
We agree to disagree then.
Edit: Well actually, fits nicely into the hypothesis anyway. He trolls, attempts to get people angry, some do get angry.
He gets punished, verbally, receives sexual gratification. He then repeats.
In some cases (e.g. me) where he cannot get me to emotionally respond, he escalates to the point he is in clear breach of the AW rules (with racial slurs and threats of violence).
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
Skrevet av Guest, 30.04.2014 at 23:45
Skrevet av KYBL, 30.04.2014 at 22:35
Zombie, unleashed has been trolling this entire time.
Maybe he really is that dumb. I did see on his blog a anti religion post. And why would he go so far?
That's a good point - I forgot about the blog. He no longer posts the URL. Perhaps he was trying to get people to read it (?!?) but that's a ... counterintuitive way to accomplish this, especially as he continues with the rants but doesn't include his blog URL.
Laster...
Laster...
|
|
1. The Holocaust happened. On this we both agree.
Sorry, there's no proof of this ever happening.
Laster...
Laster...
|
