Upvote

Skrevet av Nero, 10.01.2015 at 12:23

Now we just need to be able to tag people in forum posts

we all gonna upvote nero's posts not fair

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 17:27

Skrevet av Nero, 10.01.2015 at 12:23

Now we just need to be able to tag people in forum posts

we all gonna upvote nero's posts not fair

Skrevet av chill, 10.01.2015 at 17:16

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 16:35

Skrevet av Mobster, 10.01.2015 at 13:58

Upvote4upvote?

ok upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 18:07

Skrevet av chill, 10.01.2015 at 17:16

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 16:35

Skrevet av Mobster, 10.01.2015 at 13:58

Upvote4upvote?

ok upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

Skrevet av Croat, 10.01.2015 at 18:38

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 18:07

Skrevet av chill, 10.01.2015 at 17:16

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 16:35

Skrevet av Mobster, 10.01.2015 at 13:58

Upvote4upvote?

ok upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 19:04

Skrevet av Croat, 10.01.2015 at 18:38

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 18:07

Skrevet av chill, 10.01.2015 at 17:16

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 16:35

Skrevet av Mobster, 10.01.2015 at 13:58

Upvote4upvote?

ok upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

Skrevet av Croat, 10.01.2015 at 19:51

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 19:04

Skrevet av Croat, 10.01.2015 at 18:38

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 18:07

Skrevet av chill, 10.01.2015 at 17:16

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 16:35

Skrevet av Mobster, 10.01.2015 at 13:58

Upvote4upvote?

ok upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 19:59

Skrevet av Croat, 10.01.2015 at 19:51

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 19:04

Skrevet av Croat, 10.01.2015 at 18:38

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 18:07

Skrevet av chill, 10.01.2015 at 17:16

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 16:35

Skrevet av Mobster, 10.01.2015 at 13:58

Upvote4upvote?

ok upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

upvoted

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 10:11

How many Upvotes a single player has given out should be listed on the players profile.

Here's an honest answer: this feature isn't necessary.

Do you see how many reps I give to other people? No. If that's the case, why should you care about how many upvotes I give to other people? The two are perhaps the closest functioning features on atwar. If I can't see how many reps I give to other people, the same should apply to upvotes.

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 20:26

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 10:11

How many Upvotes a single player has given out should be listed on the players profile.

Here's an honest answer: this feature isn't necessary. At all.

Do you see how many reps I give to other people? No. If that's the case, why should you care about how many upvotes I give to other people? The two are perhaps the closest functioning features on atwar. If I can't see how many reps I give to other people, the same should apply to upvotes.

The point was not to make it meaningless like reps. Something needs to be distinguised.. The Rep feature is useless, The elo feature is useless, the ranking system is uselss.. So whats your point.

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 20:36

Skrevet av Guest, 10.01.2015 at 20:26

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 10:11

How many Upvotes a single player has given out should be listed on the players profile.

Here's an honest answer: this feature isn't necessary. At all.

Do you see how many reps I give to other people? No. If that's the case, why should you care about how many upvotes I give to other people? The two are perhaps the closest functioning features on atwar. If I can't see how many reps I give to other people, the same should apply to upvotes.

The point was not to make it meaningless like reps. Something needs to be distinguised.. The Rep feature is useless, The elo feature is useless, the ranking system is uselss.. So whats your point.

Rep is useful. More reps you jave, more easier you fuck a girl..
More elo you have, more bukakka you produce.
Everything is useful same as my comment

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 10:37

Skrevet av Abraham, 10.01.2015 at 10:34

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 10:15

Skrevet av Abraham, 10.01.2015 at 10:13

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 10:11

How many Upvotes a single player has given out should be listed on the players profile.

It's already there:

tx didn't notice it.

EDIT: No sorry, thats how many you received. I just tried it. How many times the player has upvoted someone else is what I am talking about.

Oh sorry, i didn't care to read your entire post. My mistake

Then don't bother to give a half ass answer.

perfect example of a 10 year old given a computer and keyboard, maturity isnt here

As a rp player , does that mean i can get a upvote ?

Reading this whole thing makes me realize how much ivan has stopped trying and more become death1812 2.0, literally this offers nothing but incitive to troll to community and spam "upvote4upvote" as seen in the previous 10 posts about it. This is another useless addition that could be added after html5 is added and some real concerns are address, like idk maybe the 2 year old map making system that bugs out all the time and is so frustrating and unorganized, please listen to more then just the trolls of the community, while i dont have a problem with this it serves no purpose to be put ahead of other things that are for the bettering of the game.

I actually dont get this at all, this game has so many lacks at so many points. You guys should actually focus a bit more on these important things, I have seen alot of good ideas in the forums.. You guys keep taking time for little things like these which are totally unneccesary and probably will lead to more off-topic comments like :'' My statement is better since it has more ''likes'' ...

What happened to this game ..

Skrevet av Quantum027, 11.01.2015 at 01:07

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 10:37

Skrevet av Abraham, 10.01.2015 at 10:34

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 10:15

Skrevet av Abraham, 10.01.2015 at 10:13

Skrevet av Mr_Own_U, 10.01.2015 at 10:11

How many Upvotes a single player has given out should be listed on the players profile.

It's already there:

tx didn't notice it.

EDIT: No sorry, thats how many you received. I just tried it. How many times the player has upvoted someone else is what I am talking about.

Oh sorry, i didn't care to read your entire post. My mistake

Then don't bother to give a half ass answer.

perfect example of a 10 year old given a computer and keyboard, maturity isnt here

Scrub Scrub Washing in the Tub....

Skrevet av Waffel, 11.01.2015 at 09:17

I actually dont get this at all, this game has so many lacks at so many points. You guys should actually focus a bit more on these important things, I have seen alot of good ideas in the forums.. You guys keep taking time for little things like these which are totally unneccesary and probably will lead to more off-topic comments like :'' My statement is better since it has more ''likes'' ...

What happened to this game ..

support

Skrevet av clovis1122, 11.01.2015 at 16:36

Skrevet av Quantum027, 11.01.2015 at 12:06

Skrevet av Waffel, 11.01.2015 at 09:17

I actually dont get this at all, this game has so many lacks at so many points. You guys should actually focus a bit more on these important things, I have seen alot of good ideas in the forums.. You guys keep taking time for little things like these which are totally unneccesary and probably will lead to more off-topic comments like :'' My statement is better since it has more ''likes'' ...

What happened to this game ..

support

Probably because implementing something in-game would need to be made twice (Now on silverlight and later on HTML5)

so was this a support comment because ivan has to program this for both silverlight and html5? i was confused

Skrevet av clovis1122, 11.01.2015 at 23:45

Skrevet av Quantum027, 11.01.2015 at 23:11

so was this a support comment because ivan has to program this for both silverlight and html5? i was confused

Not sure if I understand what you say.... but I've hear that they won't implement stuff in-game, because they would need to program the same feature on HTML5.

But that applies for in-game, since the website (forums) are already on html5... so buttons or features like upvotes only requires to be programmed one time.

oh ok i get what you are saying, but my point is still valid that this is unnecessary when we have things like html that need to be added

BUMP

Ivan are you implementing down vote button? it would complete the agree/disagree points of one argument. And also would counter those players that upvote everything.

Skrevet av Nero, 10.01.2015 at 12:23

Now we just need to be able to tag people in forum posts

I would also like to see a more user friendly tag system.

There is a workaround to this if you wish to tag a player that has not been active on a particular thread. All you need to do is use the same UBB code as if you were quoting another player and find the player profile id number. example mauzer panteri:
.

So it would appear like this:

Skrevet av Mauzer Panteri, 31.12.1969 at 18:00

You can quote/tag as many players as you like in one post.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 24.01.2015 at 12:47

BUMP

Ivan are you implementing down vote button? it would complete the agree/disagree points of one argument. And also would counter those players that upvote everything.

Hopefully not.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 24.01.2015 at 12:47

BUMP

Ivan are you implementing down vote button? it would complete the agree/disagree points of one argument. And also would counter those players that upvote everything.

How could a down vote button ever be construed as constructive? It will only lead to less popular players having their forums 'downvoted' and discourage activity in the forum overall. Otherwise facebook would of introduced a similar feature to this years ago.

Skrevet av Aston Martin, 29.01.2015 at 11:53

Skrevet av clovis1122, 24.01.2015 at 12:47

BUMP

Ivan are you implementing down vote button? it would complete the agree/disagree points of one argument. And also would counter those players that upvote everything.

How could a down vote button ever be construed as constructive? It will only lead to less popular players having their forums 'downvoted' and discourage activity in the forum overall. Otherwise facebook would of introduced a similar feature to this years ago.

Rather than reply I could just upvote your comment. How is this different from quoting you and saying "I don't support" or "I don't agree with you" ?

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.01.2015 at 12:04

Skrevet av Aston Martin, 29.01.2015 at 11:53

Skrevet av clovis1122, 24.01.2015 at 12:47

BUMP

Ivan are you implementing down vote button? it would complete the agree/disagree points of one argument. And also would counter those players that upvote everything.

How could a down vote button ever be construed as constructive? It will only lead to less popular players having their forums 'downvoted' and discourage activity in the forum overall. Otherwise facebook would of introduced a similar feature to this years ago.

Rather than reply I could just upvote your comment. How is this different from quoting you and saying "I don't support" or "I don't agree with you" ?

Because it does not offer anything constructive.

Skrevet av Aston Martin, 29.01.2015 at 11:53

Skrevet av clovis1122, 24.01.2015 at 12:47

BUMP

Ivan are you implementing down vote button? it would complete the agree/disagree points of one argument. And also would counter those players that upvote everything.

How could a down vote button ever be construed as constructive? It will only lead to less popular players having their forums 'downvoted' and discourage activity in the forum overall. Otherwise facebook would of introduced a similar feature to this years ago.

Rather than reply I could just downvote your comment. How is this different from quoting you and saying "I don't support" or "I don't agree with you" ?

For your argument, it will only discourage someone's activity if he take them serious.... or if he is a really bad person. Which is good.

My argument still stand. Feel free to reply it.

Skrevet av SQUARED, 29.01.2015 at 11:59

Skrevet av Aston Martin, 29.01.2015 at 11:53

Skrevet av clovis1122, 24.01.2015 at 12:47

BUMP

Ivan are you implementing down vote button? it would complete the agree/disagree points of one argument. And also would counter those players that upvote everything.

How could a down vote button ever be construed as constructive? It will only lead to less popular players having their forums 'downvoted' and discourage activity in the forum overall. Otherwise facebook would of introduced a similar feature to this years ago.

If they repeatedly have their posts downvoted then maybe they are just posting nonsense and should be discouraged from posting on the forums.

That unfortunately wouldn't always be the case and would be easily abused.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.01.2015 at 12:06

Skrevet av Aston Martin, 29.01.2015 at 11:53

Skrevet av clovis1122, 24.01.2015 at 12:47

BUMP

Ivan are you implementing down vote button? it would complete the agree/disagree points of one argument. And also would counter those players that upvote everything.

How could a down vote button ever be construed as constructive? It will only lead to less popular players having their forums 'downvoted' and discourage activity in the forum overall. Otherwise facebook would of introduced a similar feature to this years ago.

Rather than reply I could just downvote your comment. How is this different from quoting you and saying "I don't support" or "I don't agree with you" ?

For your argument, it will only discourage someone's activity if he take them serious.... or if he is a really bad person. Which is good.

My argument still stand. Feel free to reply it.

Simply down voting does not offer any constructive criticism only criticism. Which does not add any thing of value to any forum post, there must be a reason that can be explained in any post when there is a disagreement. What if the player is not a bad person and does not deserve their posts down voted. Having a down button would also contradict the general rules of AtWar regading forum posts.

Skrevet av Aston Martin, 29.01.2015 at 12:15

Simply down voting does not offer any constructive criticism only criticism. Which does not add any thing of value to any forum post, there must be a reason that can be explained in any post when there is a disagreement. What if the player is not a bad person and does not deserve their posts down voted. Having a down button would also contradict the general rules of AtWar regading forum posts.

Watch this:

Sitat:

Simply up voting does not offer any constructive criticism only criticism. Which does not add any thing of value to any forum post, there must be a reason that can be explained in any post when there is an agreement. What if the player is not a good person and does not deserve their posts up voted. Having a up button would also contradict the general rules of AtWar regading forum posts.

For those situation in which a player could "unfairly" down vote someone, I am just going to reply there are situation in which a player could up vote "unfairly" someone. Once again, both Upvote/Downvote only mean something if you take them personal.

And what with those situation in which a player had been show to down vote someone without reason? I would reply this:

Skrevet av Aston Martin, 29.01.2015 at 12:06

That unfortunately wouldn't always be the case and would be easily abused.

Do you notice the mirror? In my opinion, everything have a good and bad effect. But we say they are good or bad when the good effects are way higher than the bad effect. As for the down vote button, I think the advantages are higher than the disadvantage.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.01.2015 at 12:28

Skrevet av Aston Martin, 29.01.2015 at 12:15

Simply down voting does not offer any constructive criticism only criticism. Which does not add any thing of value to any forum post, there must be a reason that can be explained in any post when there is a disagreement. What if the player is not a bad person and does not deserve their posts down voted. Having a down button would also contradict the general rules of AtWar regading forum posts.

Watch this:

Sitat:

Simply up voting does not offer any constructive criticism only criticism. Which does not add any thing of value to any forum post, there must be a reason that can be explained in any post when there is an agreement. What if the player is not a good person and does not deserve their posts up voted. Having a up button would also contradict the general rules of AtWar regading forum posts.

For those situation in which a player could "unfairly" down vote someone, I am just going to reply there are situation in which a player could up vote "unfairly" someone. Once again, both Upvote/Downvote only mean something if you take them personal.

And what with those situation in which a player had been show to down vote someone without reason? I would reply this:

Skrevet av Aston Martin, 29.01.2015 at 12:06

That unfortunately wouldn't always be the case and would be easily abused.

Do you notice the mirror? In my opinion, everything have a good and bad effect. But we say they are good or bad when the good effects are way higher than the bad effect. As for the down vote button, I think the advantages are higher than the disadvantage.

Still provides no constructive input regarding peoples post and the up vote' button provides a purpose to reduce 'support' spam. As I say a player would state their reasons if their was a disagreement. Unless a player would like to contribute something extra, the up vote button, provides a purposeful function and reduces spam. Down voting has only negative repercussions.