Non-Retarded Scenarios are dead. R.I.P 2012-2015

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 13:53

Skrevet av Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 12:22

I don't have to prove that ww1 takes no skill, its my opinion and most people agree, opinions can't be wrong.
now you may try to convince us to agree with your opinion, but for that you need to provide real arguments instead of biased emotional responses.

You're right in everything that wasn't slashed.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 11:02

Skrevet av Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 12:22

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 11:02

Fun fact: After stating WW1 and RP, Tunder want to include WW2.

Take a look at the number of initial players

Where's your point?
I've never said that it was common that games start at max players (I am not even in the position to say so). On the other hand, you've stated it as impossible. Read your own words...

Skrevet av clovis1122, 28.07.2015 at 13:14

Skrevet av Tundy, 28.07.2015 at 13:05

Don't believe me? Host a non-political/Non-RP scenario that requires 20 people and then post a ss here.

wtf this is bs not even in my times a good scenario could'be filled up with 20 players. Even the WW2 of Tik had problems finding the players due to leavers/banners.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 13:53

As soon as I provide you one example, your whole argument break up. And I've already provide one:

Skrevet av clovis1122, 28.07.2015 at 14:45

Pavle's WWII filled up with 18 players.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 13:53

I love data cherry picking. Let's show the worst side of Paris and the best side of Teheran, just so we can conclude that Teheran is best place than Paris.

As Prussia you have the power to break Russian walls. Apparently there was no enemy in that screenshot you've posted. I am still unsure what you're trying to prove...

Skrevet av Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 14:15

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 13:53

Skrevet av Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 12:22

I don't have to prove that ww1 takes no skill, its my opinion and most people agree, opinions can't be wrong.
now you may try to convince us to agree with your opinion, but for that you need to provide real arguments instead of biased emotional responses.

You're right in everything that wasn't slashed.

And WHO ARE YOU to say that i am wrong? prove it or gtfo.

Skrevet av Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 14:15

so if i defeated you then ww1 takes no skill?
With that logic, i defeated you in dreamworld, therefore dreamworld takes no skill.
and i also defeated you in hex world, so hex world takes no skill either.
and i have defeated a rank 12 in europe when i was a low rank, therefore europe takes no skill.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 11:02

> 1 game. No I am talking about the gameplay. All those walls that Russia need to make for stop Prussians requires skill. Else Prussia would win the game before revolution. If you want to lose fast, then simply don't wall / make few walls. The funny fact is that this doesn't apply for 1 game, but to all games. A gameplay is what should'be considered and based on before measuring the skill required in one spot.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 14:48

Implying I even say you're wrong. I cannot say it is right or wrong something I don't know about, so I cannot really tell you if god exist, nor if most people agrees with you (you didn't even specified where). Also I've see before politics that are able to convince people with "biased emotional responses", so yes, fallacies can change people's opinion.

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 14:48

Wow, totally dismiss my point about gameplay. Interesting how in your last comment you stopped quoting it. Unless you can prove that dreamworld and hex world have the same gameplay as WW1, you should dismiss those words. I'll quote myself again:

Skrevet av clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 11:02

> 1 game. No I am talking about the gameplay. All those walls that Russia need to make for stop Prussians requires skill. Else Prussia would win the game before revolution. If you want to lose fast, then simply don't wall / make few walls. The funny fact is that this doesn't apply for 1 game, but to all games. A gameplay is what should'be considered and based on before measuring the skill required in one spot.