Delete acc boywind

And I want my elo back, the mod that deleted the duels should be removed from mod team, he doesnt even know what a rewall is.

From a good player, that doesnt hate me/think im hacking/illy fag

LOL

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I understand rewalling in a CW and getting it deleted since honor code. But there are no rules saying you can't rewall/wf in duels.

I even made a thread suggesting new duel guidelines to prevent rewalls/wf's in duels. Because low rank players can do this just to steal elo from a high ranked player which would be unfair.
https://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=43438

Brian even said that duels were ultimately up the the person knowing who exactly they're dueling and if you don't want to play them then don't play them. And that duels would not be monitored.

Skrevet av PleaseMe, 06.05.2020 at 16:04

I understand rewalling in a CW and getting it deleted since honor code. But there are no rules saying you can't rewall/wf in duels.

I even made a thread suggesting new duel guidelines to prevent rewalls/wf's in duels. Because low rank players can do this just to steal elo from a high ranked player which would be unfair.

Why are some things official but other things arent?

because froyer asked mods to sanction the duel before the game in the presence of 3 mods and specified no rewalls serbwalls and loser deletes account
then he decides to break his own rule and rewall

Skrevet av boywind2, 06.05.2020 at 16:09

Skrevet av PleaseMe, 06.05.2020 at 16:04

I understand rewalling in a CW and getting it deleted since honor code. But there are no rules saying you can't rewall/wf in duels.

I even made a thread suggesting new duel guidelines to prevent rewalls/wf's in duels. Because low rank players can do this just to steal elo from a high ranked player which would be unfair.

Why are some things official but other things arent?

because froyer asked mods to sanction the duel before the game in the presence of 3 mods and specified no rewalls serbwalls and loser deletes account
then he decides to break his own rule and rewall

mod sanctioned duel this is made up there is no such thing in terms of elo. Yea maybe you won't get account deleted but elo stays IMO

Skrevet av PleaseMe, 06.05.2020 at 16:11

Skrevet av boywind2, 06.05.2020 at 16:09

Skrevet av PleaseMe, 06.05.2020 at 16:04

I understand rewalling in a CW and getting it deleted since honor code. But there are no rules saying you can't rewall/wf in duels.

I even made a thread suggesting new duel guidelines to prevent rewalls/wf's in duels. Because low rank players can do this just to steal elo from a high ranked player which would be unfair.

Why are some things official but other things arent?

because froyer asked mods to sanction the duel before the game in the presence of 3 mods and specified no rewalls serbwalls and loser deletes account
then he decides to break his own rule and rewall

mod sanctioned duel this is made up there is no such thing in terms of elo. Yea maybe you won't get account deleted but elo stays IMO

what do you mean this is exactly like the cw with your clan
there was an honor code and froyer made it and asked the mods to sanction it
froyer broke the honor and his duel got deleted

there was an honor code that people made and asked mods to sanction it
illy broke it and the cw got deleted
literally the same thing

and you were the one who kept pushing for illy cw to be deleted
how can you argue in one way when it fits you then turn the other way lol

Skrevet av boywind2, 06.05.2020 at 16:16

Skrevet av PleaseMe, 06.05.2020 at 16:11

Skrevet av boywind2, 06.05.2020 at 16:09

Skrevet av PleaseMe, 06.05.2020 at 16:04

I understand rewalling in a CW and getting it deleted since honor code. But there are no rules saying you can't rewall/wf in duels.

I even made a thread suggesting new duel guidelines to prevent rewalls/wf's in duels. Because low rank players can do this just to steal elo from a high ranked player which would be unfair.

Why are some things official but other things arent?

because froyer asked mods to sanction the duel before the game in the presence of 3 mods and specified no rewalls serbwalls and loser deletes account
then he decides to break his own rule and rewall

mod sanctioned duel this is made up there is no such thing in terms of elo. Yea maybe you won't get account deleted but elo stays IMO

what do you mean this is exactly like the cw with your clan
there was an honor code and froyer made it and asked the mods to sanction it
froyer broke the honor and his duel got deleted

there was an honor code that people made and asked mods to sanction it
illy broke it and the cw got deleted
literally the same thing

and you were the one who kept pushing for illy cw to be deleted
how can you argue in one way when it fits you then turn the other way lol

Can you give me a link to a rulebook thread stating that if you rewall in a duel it will get deleted. Because if so then i want all my losses due to rewalls/wf's deleted 1800 elo here I come.

Skrevet av PleaseMe, 06.05.2020 at 16:20

Skrevet av boywind2, 06.05.2020 at 16:16

Skrevet av PleaseMe, 06.05.2020 at 16:11

Skrevet av boywind2, 06.05.2020 at 16:09

Skrevet av PleaseMe, 06.05.2020 at 16:04

I understand rewalling in a CW and getting it deleted since honor code. But there are no rules saying you can't rewall/wf in duels.

I even made a thread suggesting new duel guidelines to prevent rewalls/wf's in duels. Because low rank players can do this just to steal elo from a high ranked player which would be unfair.

Why are some things official but other things arent?

because froyer asked mods to sanction the duel before the game in the presence of 3 mods and specified no rewalls serbwalls and loser deletes account
then he decides to break his own rule and rewall

mod sanctioned duel this is made up there is no such thing in terms of elo. Yea maybe you won't get account deleted but elo stays IMO

what do you mean this is exactly like the cw with your clan
there was an honor code and froyer made it and asked the mods to sanction it
froyer broke the honor and his duel got deleted

there was an honor code that people made and asked mods to sanction it
illy broke it and the cw got deleted
literally the same thing

and you were the one who kept pushing for illy cw to be deleted
how can you argue in one way when it fits you then turn the other way lol

Can you give me a link to a rulebook thread stating that if you rewall in a duel it will get deleted

idk why you are crying about the rule book and dodging anything that i say lol
there was a mod sanctioned honor code for the duel
froyer broke the duel and it was deleted
how is that any different from the cw honor code?

Froyers that's a rewall. The ss is conclusive. I didn't think it was a rewall at first but you can't argue with this ss. Look at the 3 wall units moving to bela....

Skrevet av Permamuted, 06.05.2020 at 17:22

Froyers that's a rewall. The ss is conclusive. I didn't think it was a rewall at first but you can't argue with this ss. Look at the 3 wall units moving to bela....

Its not a rewall, ankara isnt walled, its like a serbwall when only 1 part is walled, its not a sebrwall.
We need to debate on what is a rewall, because if we say that shit, bigwalls are rewall technically, so I rewalled t2 when I made a new wall.

Skrevet av Froyer, 06.05.2020 at 17:26

Its not a rewall, ankara isnt walled, its like a serbwall when only 1 part is walled, its not a sebrwall.
We need to debate on what is a rewall, because if we say that shit, bigwalls are rewall technically, so I rewalled t2 when I made a new wall.

Bonker summed it up here.



Sid opened a can of worms when he deleted our cw vs ASS. This is just more of this bullshit.

Skrevet av Froyer, 06.05.2020 at 17:26

Skrevet av Permamuted, 06.05.2020 at 17:22

Froyers that's a rewall. The ss is conclusive. I didn't think it was a rewall at first but you can't argue with this ss. Look at the 3 wall units moving to bela....

Its not a rewall, ankara isnt walled, its like a serbwall when only 1 part is walled, its not a sebrwall.
We need to debate on what is a rewall, because if we say that shit, bigwalls are rewall technically, so I rewalled t2 when I made a new wall.

if the majority says it is a rewall then it is a rewall you dummy
there is no debate
there are no more arguments
you a rewaller and you should delete your account for cheating

I urge any mod who sees this not to delete any acc of these 15yo who still think death duel is fun.

You guys vented your anger on that dd, you brought it on forums and started a drama, it's enough, let's be friends now!

If most people say earth is flat then it is.

What kind of an idiot questions that?

Let me say firstly that yeah Froyer I still think you know some weird shit from bugs. However that doesn't mean I'm biased on whatever has to do with you. This is an obvious rewall yet you try to save yourself by belittling everyone and holding on bugs' statement, a person who made you look like a fool, you got mad at and now because it suits you, you want his opinion.
I agree duel shouldn't have been removed, but IMO you can't ask for boywind to delete his account.
Second of all, about rewalling and all that allowed in CWs. I'm of the idea that walling more than one time a city is exxageration ( Yeah I know I'm using it but that' the meta, what should I do? ) . Rewalling, serbwalling or teamwalling they all are extra moves to make a player even less skilled and I will you why. Is it the same having to worry about protecting your land while putting pressure on the enemy, with just pressuring your opponent and making new walls to not have to worry about your land? I consider that a move of players who want their lives to be easier. Without all them walls it's getting full strategical and reading your opponent. I like that.

Skrevet av Cold Case, 07.05.2020 at 06:02

I consider that a move of players who want their lives to be easier. Without all them walls it's getting full strategical and reading your opponent. I like that.

Who doesn't want their lives to be easier? Even you must apply that logic in real life, for sure....

Walls can be strategical and can require you of reading your opponent's intentions.

You're talking purely subjective there... everyone has their likes and dislikes...

Skrevet av Cold Case, 07.05.2020 at 06:02

Let me say firstly that yeah Froyer I still think you know some weird shit from bugs. However that doesn't mean I'm biased on whatever has to do with you. This is an obvious rewall yet you try to save yourself by belittling everyone and holding on bugs' statement, a person who made you look like a fool, you got mad at and now because it suits you, you want his opinion.
I agree duel shouldn't have been removed, but IMO you can't ask for boywind to delete his account.
Second of all, about rewalling and all that allowed in CWs. I'm of the idea that walling more than one time a city is exxageration ( Yeah I know I'm using it but that' the meta, what should I do? ) . Rewalling, serbwalling or teamwalling they all are extra moves to make a player even less skilled and I will you why. Is it the same having to worry about protecting your land while putting pressure on the enemy, with just pressuring your opponent and making new walls to not have to worry about your land? I consider that a move of players who want their lives to be easier. Without all them walls it's getting full strategical and reading your opponent. I like that.

First I was mad at bugs for weeks till he tells me why he did that shit, I laughed and started to talk to him few weeks ago.

Second, if it's rewall, why nobody cried when I was doing it earlier, I'm doing this almost every duels or cws lol, except if u guys are full noob u should have seen it earlier or only grom is good at this game and rest suck at it and can't watch battle screen, or u guys are saying it's rewall to save boywind, which is cute af.

Third, u call me hacker for months now with ur friends viva and tryst, and use this fake rewall as an excuse to fix personal shit.

And finally, it's not a rewall, Ankara isn't walled, but u couldn't understand bridging maybe it's too hard for u to understand what is a rewall then.

REWALLER! DISQUALIFIED! DELETE ACCOUNT!

Skrevet av Froyer, 07.05.2020 at 09:21

First I was mad at bugs for weeks till he tells me why he did that shit, I laughed and started to talk to him few weeks ago.

Second, if it's rewall, why nobody cried when I was doing it earlier, I'm doing this almost every duels or cws lol, except if u guys are full noob u should have seen it earlier or only grom is good at this game and rest suck at it and can't watch battle screen, or u guys are saying it's rewall to save boywind, which is cute af.

Third, u call me hacker for months now with ur friends viva and tryst, and use this fake rewall as an excuse to fix personal shit.

And finally, it's not a rewall, Ankara isn't walled, but u couldn't understand bridging maybe it's too hard for u to understand what is a rewall then.

froyer's ego

Lets get 1800 elo and easy 50$ with cheating


He is broke nigga what you even expected
of course he will cheating.Be careful guys you dont play duel against French nobleman
You play against broke dirty player (afro+beta faktard)
He also cheat IRL as well + selling drugs.

I dont know how he became supporter here.
( that cheater decide for strategies nerfs ra bombers +9 att crackhead 100% )

Or he lick lick lick to much lollipops

This is hilarious. Have fun writing whole threads about pseudo-academical definitions of what is a rewall and what is not, discussing this after every cw and duel. I propose from now on everybody meticulously screenshots their battlescreen after every single turn, and after every game a group of dedicated scholars (think a fourth group added to devs, mods and supporters) elects a tribunal of five judges to determine whether all walls were legitimate in that game. They have to come to a decision within 4 days, and only then will the duel be added to the player profiles / the cw list.

You guys brought this onto yourself when you agreed that 'rewall should be banned'. Would've been easier to just go by the classic rules b0nker mentioned, and either petition Dave to change wall mechanics or just live with the fact that you must counter rewalls but by that avoid these stupid forum discussions.

Also, as per my definition Froyer's wall isn't a rewall, but I see why some people would like to extend the definition of rewall to include that (wall replaced by wall, even though it's not a wall around a city). I saw nic do this as well though in a duel if I remember correctly, and someone called it 'half a rewall'.

Maybe we could just stop doing actual games and just make aw a purely forum-based discussion game.

Remove walls
Imagine atwar without walls and bugs

Also, what if Froyer had placed the new two units above of Ankara more to the coast? The old wall would be broken, yet there would be a new partial bigwall preventing bw from attacking anyways. Would that be a rewall? Where is the point where something becomes a rewall?

Is this still a rewall?


Now what about this? The new wall units are at a different position?


Is removing a normal wall and building a bigwall not a form of rewalling? The inner wall can get broken by a unit, yet the new bigwall will take its function by completely walling Ankara. This has exactly the same effect as an ordinary rewall, and can only be countered by a wallfuck (exactly the same counter as against an ordinary rewall).




At what point does something become 'not a rewall'? Completely serious question. Because given that turkey does not wf/place units in Ukraine (which is also how you would counter a classical rewall: By placing another/other unit/s), the walls in the two lowermost pictures below have exactly the same effect as the 'Froyer rewall' in the first picture:

Smart guy SuperiorCacaocow

Skrevet av SuperiorCacaocow, 07.05.2020 at 13:59

[/img]

Are you serious? You dont know what a rewall is? Or just as confused as lelouch, maybe you skipped the part where wd tried to explain to him what a rewall is, and when i visualised it for him, no matter il just copy pasta it. ///


No lelouch, rewall isnt gender studies, its one concrete thing, and since you are confused ill make this as simple as possible.




This is not a rewall. None of the initial wall units were moved out.
You may know this wall, because we call it a "huarck wall" these days.




This is a rewall. And this is what happened in the froyer SS too.

Wd already said it best:

Rewalling is purposefully MOVING your walling units and then putting a new wall up. When you move your walling unit, the enemy unit sent to wf can completely miss the attack order because the wall units escaped the tb. When you put up a new wall, you are abusing the fact that the wf unit did not attack.

Rewalling is when YOU MOVED THE WALL + Add the new wall to abuse the fact that you can avoid the turnblock of the wfing unit to remain walled for another turn.
If you think this sort of crap is okay, then you better be prepared for some bullshit when I duel you.

Nah rewalling is when u remove a triangle wall to remake one, or an "unbreakable" triangle wall by removing 1/2 units from the wall.

That's a rewall, not what I did, guess the player.

I don't agree with wd's rewall definition, I don't recognize it as THE rewall definition, if we say the same thing, clovis said it wasn't a rewall.
Who has the right definition of a rewall?

Skrevet av Froyer, 07.05.2020 at 14:30

I don't agree with wd's rewall definition, I don't recognize it as THE rewall definition, if we say the same thing, clovis said it wasn't a rewall.
Who has the right definition of a rewall?

haha rewaller keep crying