The new Elo-based CW rankings - are they good?

We've introduced new system for Coalition Wars rankings, based on Elo, same as duels. There's an overall and seasonal rating. Does it work better than the old CP/Competence system?
http://atwar-game.com/news/news.php?news_id=142

Yes

Skrevet av Ivan, 05.03.2015 at 04:19

Okay, but how does it work? I think "Exactly as ELO system" doesn't means much for those who doesn't know about it.

And the faq still have old CP formula.... http://atwar-game.com/home/faq.php?faq_id=39

I dont like this one, but its better than last one atleast...

Much better than previous ones, especially the unlimited games.

offtopic: 28 visited but 46 votes?

Skrevet av Guest, 06.03.2015 at 18:57

Much better than previous ones, especially the unlimited games.

offtopic: 28 visited but 46 votes?

Skrevet av Guest, 06.03.2015 at 18:57

Much better than previous ones, especially the unlimited games.

offtopic: 28 visited but 46 votes?

the poll is also on the homepage.

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

Skrevet av ArminyMouse, 10.03.2015 at 05:32

Y,for cosa this new system is great

Because we are active and win 2 out of 3 games we play, so yes it suits us just fine.

Great system, much better than last one.

ps. Im sorry for Shadow Aces
Pavle in your team = no one system good enough to catch trophy. Cry, pavle, cry

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

This. Wouldn't include until a clan has played at least 10 games as b0nker suggests.

Skrevet av b0nker2, 09.03.2015 at 17:11

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

At least 20 or maybe 30 cw should be played before a clan can be deemed competitive and feature on the top coalitions table, it's only fair to those clans that are are active.

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

Definitely!

System works great, but this 'little' thing is needed to make all perfect.

Skrevet av Sun Tsu, 19.03.2015 at 09:18

Skrevet av b0nker2, 09.03.2015 at 17:11

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

At least 20 or maybe 30 cw should be played before a clan can be deemed competitive and feature on the top coalitions table, it's only fair to those clans that are are active.

agreed there definitely is a need for a min amount of cws to be on thecompetitive board mabe 30 since it was good amount last season

Skrevet av Eagle, 05.03.2015 at 07:28

I dont like this one, but its better than last one atleast...

how do you think this system can be improved?

Skrevet av Sun Tsu, 30.03.2015 at 13:53

Skrevet av Eagle, 05.03.2015 at 07:28

I dont like this one, but its better than last one atleast...

Just out of curiosity, how do you think this system can be improved?

Desu explained it perfectly

Max 30 games is good

Skrevet av Guest, 06.03.2015 at 18:57

Much better than previous ones, especially the unlimited games.

offtopic: 28 visited but 46 votes?

the pole is accessible from the Atwar home page, meaning most players don't come to this forum at all

Skrevet av b0nker2, 09.03.2015 at 17:11

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

this will make people not cw alot anymore like before :/ look the cw games rate rigth now its much more x3

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:45

Skrevet av b0nker2, 09.03.2015 at 17:11

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

this will make people not cw alot anymore like before :/ look the cw games rate rigth now its much more x3

Quite the opposite, if they need a minimum of 10 to be on leader board, they will play at least 10

I just hate how every one is suggesting the thing that make him happy and not the best for game
some people that have no thing to do whole day wants unlimit cw count
some people that do few cws want limit to not get disadvatnged but that will break the cw rating because people will play less cw after :/t
counting the people that cry about 1rank who usualy used to get advantge by the old cw system by taking 100cp and lossing 50 they want the old one or at last the cw limit so they do few cws and get much elo....
through my clan is doing very few cws (4yet) i still support making it unlimit
please stop praying for your selvness advantge

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 11:47

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:45

Skrevet av b0nker2, 09.03.2015 at 17:11

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

this will make people not cw alot anymore like before :/ look the cw games rate rigth now its much more x3

Quite the opposite, if they need a minimum of 10 to be on leader board, they will play at least 10

lol im not going to have argue with you because you always dont change your mind even if god came and told you it
but if someone have made a pet with me for my account about what you saying i would accept

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:56

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 11:47

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:45

Skrevet av b0nker2, 09.03.2015 at 17:11

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

this will make people not cw alot anymore like before :/ look the cw games rate rigth now its much more x3

Quite the opposite, if they need a minimum of 10 to be on leader board, they will play at least 10

lol im not going to have argue with you because you always dont change your mind even if god came and told you it
but if someone have made a pet with me for my account about what you saying i would accept

10 clan wars in 3 months is not a lot. Your clan 4 in a month would meet the requirement, but it does not seems right that you can cw only 4 times and be high placed. Give me an argument of why you or another clan should be

Sitat:

Sitat:

Sitat:

Sitat:

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

lol im not going to have argue with you because you always dont change your mind even if god came and told you it

I'm quite capable of changing my opinion if you give me a decent argument. Thanks.

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 12:02

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:56

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 11:47

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:45

Skrevet av b0nker2, 09.03.2015 at 17:11

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

this will make people not cw alot anymore like before :/ look the cw games rate rigth now its much more x3

Quite the opposite, if they need a minimum of 10 to be on leader board, they will play at least 10

lol im not going to have argue with you because you always dont change your mind even if god came and told you it
but if someone have made a pet with me for my account about what you saying i would accept

10 clan wars in 3 months is not a lot. Your clan 4 in a month would meet the requirement, but it does not seems right that you can cw only 4 times and be high placed. Give me an argument of why you or another clan should be

we never lost any game thats why we have high place man and we cwed the strong clans so we took alot of elo

Sitat:

Sitat:

Sitat:

Sitat:

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 12:03

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

lol im not going to have argue with you because you always dont change your mind even if god came and told you it

I'm quite capable of changing my opinion if you give me a decent argument. Thanks.

my opinion is people will play more cws with this system and this will make more games and more challenge thats all

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 12:09

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 12:02

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:56

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 11:47

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:45

Skrevet av b0nker2, 09.03.2015 at 17:11

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

this will make people not cw alot anymore like before :/ look the cw games rate rigth now its much more x3

Quite the opposite, if they need a minimum of 10 to be on leader board, they will play at least 10

lol im not going to have argue with you because you always dont change your mind even if god came and told you it
but if someone have made a pet with me for my account about what you saying i would accept

10 clan wars in 3 months is not a lot. Your clan 4 in a month would meet the requirement, but it does not seems right that you can cw only 4 times and be high placed. Give me an argument of why you or another clan should be

we never lost any game thats why we have high place man and we cwed the strong clans so we took alot of elo

My argument is not about your clan or who you have faced, I was making the point that even you guys clan warring less than other clans would meet my proposed requirement in a three month period.

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 12:10

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 12:09

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 12:02

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:56

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.04.2015 at 11:47

Skrevet av SyrianDevil, 07.04.2015 at 11:45

Skrevet av b0nker2, 09.03.2015 at 17:11

Skrevet av Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Skrevet av b0nker2, 07.03.2015 at 17:52

Needs a minimum games for inclusion.

No it doesn't.

Reason against? At least a 10 game sample of Elo per season is important.

this will make people not cw alot anymore like before :/ look the cw games rate rigth now its much more x3

Quite the opposite, if they need a minimum of 10 to be on leader board, they will play at least 10

lol im not going to have argue with you because you always dont change your mind even if god came and told you it
but if someone have made a pet with me for my account about what you saying i would accept

10 clan wars in 3 months is not a lot. Your clan 4 in a month would meet the requirement, but it does not seems right that you can cw only 4 times and be high placed. Give me an argument of why you or another clan should be

we never lost any game thats why we have high place man and we cwed the strong clans so we took alot of elo

My argument is not about your clan or who you have faced, I was making the point that even you guys clan warring less than other clans would meet my proposed requirement in a three month period.

the problem is i dont support what my clan do xd